T-Values
- Diogenes
- PLS Super-Expert
- Posts: 899
- Joined: Sat Oct 15, 2005 5:13 pm
- Real name and title:
- Location: São Paulo - BRAZIL
- Contact:
Hi,
when we use t-values, and say that t-values are significant (t>1,65 for example), We are rejecting the hipotesis that correlation or path coefficient is equal to zero in the population (it´s significant).
Then you choose a significance level (90%, 95%, 99%, 99,9%) to have the critical t-value (minimum to be significant), or compute the significance (p-value) from the t-value presented in SmartPLS output.
Best regards
Bido
when we use t-values, and say that t-values are significant (t>1,65 for example), We are rejecting the hipotesis that correlation or path coefficient is equal to zero in the population (it´s significant).
Then you choose a significance level (90%, 95%, 99%, 99,9%) to have the critical t-value (minimum to be significant), or compute the significance (p-value) from the t-value presented in SmartPLS output.
Best regards
Bido
-
- PLS Expert User
- Posts: 139
- Joined: Wed Jul 05, 2006 1:43 pm
- Real name and title:
- Location: Coimbatore, India
t-values
Use the following values
Two Tail
90% significance level--t value-1.645
95% significance level--t value-1.96
99% significance level--t value-2.57
One tail
90% significance level--t value-1.628
95% significance level--t value-1.645
99% significance level--t value-21.96
Two Tail
90% significance level--t value-1.645
95% significance level--t value-1.96
99% significance level--t value-2.57
One tail
90% significance level--t value-1.628
95% significance level--t value-1.645
99% significance level--t value-21.96
-
- PLS Expert User
- Posts: 139
- Joined: Wed Jul 05, 2006 1:43 pm
- Real name and title:
- Location: Coimbatore, India
t-value
Sorry for one tail with 90% significance value the t-value is 1.28 not 1.628
-
- PLS Expert User
- Posts: 139
- Joined: Wed Jul 05, 2006 1:43 pm
- Real name and title:
- Location: Coimbatore, India
number of tails
Since the bootstrap sizes are 100 or more, the values are actually z-values.
By default two tail values are better, although one tail values need smaller t-values to prove significance
By default two tail values are better, although one tail values need smaller t-values to prove significance
Re: number of tails
Thanks a lot, I found literature said if the hypotheses is directional, one tail should use.viswadatta wrote:Since the bootstrap sizes are 100 or more, the values are actually z-values.
By default two tail values are better, although one tail values need smaller t-values to prove significance
-
- PLS Junior User
- Posts: 7
- Joined: Thu Mar 22, 2007 4:47 pm
- Real name and title:
I want to check my formative constructs (latent variables) in my model.
I know I have to check if the path coefficients from the indicators to the construct are significant. After bootstrapping, I got the t-values.
What should I do now?
I already calculated the p-values for each t-value. Have done it with the calculator from this site: http://danielsoper.com/statcalc3/calc.aspx?id=8
Example:
for the t-value of 2.525 the calculator says
Probability (one-tailed): 0.00586183
Probability (two-tailed): 0.01172366
How can I interpret this p-values? If I choose the two-tailed one, can I say its significant with a probability of error of 5% (because p<0,05), if I choosed my levels before as p<0,05, p<0,01 and p<0,001?
Another thing is, I am confused about if I should use a one-tailed t-test or the two-tailed t-test. In which case I have to use the one or the two tailed test?
And will be the whole procedere nearly the same if I wanna check the path coefficients of my inner model?
Please help!
Thanks!
I know I have to check if the path coefficients from the indicators to the construct are significant. After bootstrapping, I got the t-values.
What should I do now?
I already calculated the p-values for each t-value. Have done it with the calculator from this site: http://danielsoper.com/statcalc3/calc.aspx?id=8
Example:
for the t-value of 2.525 the calculator says
Probability (one-tailed): 0.00586183
Probability (two-tailed): 0.01172366
How can I interpret this p-values? If I choose the two-tailed one, can I say its significant with a probability of error of 5% (because p<0,05), if I choosed my levels before as p<0,05, p<0,01 and p<0,001?
Another thing is, I am confused about if I should use a one-tailed t-test or the two-tailed t-test. In which case I have to use the one or the two tailed test?
And will be the whole procedere nearly the same if I wanna check the path coefficients of my inner model?
Please help!
Thanks!
-
- PLS Expert User
- Posts: 248
- Joined: Sat Jul 25, 2009 1:34 pm
- Real name and title:
-
- PLS Junior User
- Posts: 1
- Joined: Thu Aug 04, 2011 2:21 am
- Real name and title:
Re: t-values
I think there may be a typing error for the t-value (one-tail) for 99% significance level. It is 2.326 and not 21.96. Please correct me if I'm wrong.viswadatta wrote:Use the following values
One tail
90% significance level--t value-1.628
95% significance level--t value-1.645
99% significance level--t value-21.96
Thanks!
-
- PLS Expert User
- Posts: 248
- Joined: Sat Jul 25, 2009 1:34 pm
- Real name and title:
Sorry, there are more typing errors than one. Firstly, we typical use a two-tailed test. The critical t-values for a two-tail test are:
90% significance t-value = 1.64
95% significance t-value = 1.96
99% significance t-value = 2.58
For a one-tailed test the critical t-values are:
90% significance t-value = 1.28
95% significance t-value = 1.64
99% significance t-value = 1.96
I hope that helps!
Christian
90% significance t-value = 1.64
95% significance t-value = 1.96
99% significance t-value = 2.58
For a one-tailed test the critical t-values are:
90% significance t-value = 1.28
95% significance t-value = 1.64
99% significance t-value = 1.96
I hope that helps!
Christian
Re: number of tails
Can you tell the literature you found?droople wrote:viswadatta wrote:
I found literature said if the hypotheses is directional, one tail should use.
-
- PLS User
- Posts: 11
- Joined: Sat Dec 03, 2011 3:31 pm
- Real name and title: