How to Deal With MICOM Result — Stage 2: compositional invariance not established
Posted: Sun Sep 10, 2023 1:26 pm
Dear everyone,
I am a newbie and trying to conduct MICOM and MGA analysis. However, result of Stage 2 (MICOM) showed 'no' compositional invarience (compositional invarience not established). What are the optimal solution for dealing with this?
I have found an article from Henseler 2016 told that "The analysis of Situation 6 shows that the lack of compositional invariance implies that the scores obtained through group-specific model estimations differ from the scores resulting from the pooled data (no measurement invariance established). Researchers should only analyze and interpret the group-specific model estimations separately."
The link of article: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content ... /full/html
Would anyone tell me in more details what and how can I do with :"analyze and interpret the group-specific model estimations separately" ?
I would like to express thankful attitude for your help,
I wish you all a good working ahead,
Best regard,
Hung
I am a newbie and trying to conduct MICOM and MGA analysis. However, result of Stage 2 (MICOM) showed 'no' compositional invarience (compositional invarience not established). What are the optimal solution for dealing with this?
I have found an article from Henseler 2016 told that "The analysis of Situation 6 shows that the lack of compositional invariance implies that the scores obtained through group-specific model estimations differ from the scores resulting from the pooled data (no measurement invariance established). Researchers should only analyze and interpret the group-specific model estimations separately."
The link of article: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content ... /full/html
Would anyone tell me in more details what and how can I do with :"analyze and interpret the group-specific model estimations separately" ?
I would like to express thankful attitude for your help,
I wish you all a good working ahead,
Best regard,
Hung