Page 1 of 1

Mediation testing

Posted: Sat Mar 07, 2020 6:40 pm
by Hedwigga
Hello. I am a beginner in SmartPLS and now using smartpls 3.2.9. I have been reading Zhao 2010, Hair 2017, Memon 2018, and several more papers. But since I'm new to both statistics and pls sem, I get easily confused. In my model, I have 3 IVs going through each of 4 MVs into 1 DV as below:

IV1 --> MV1 --> DV
IV1 --> MV2 --> DV
IV1 --> MV3 --> DV
IV1 --> MV4 --> DV

IV2 --> MV1 --> DV
IV2 --> MV2 --> DV
IV2 --> MV3 --> DV
IV2 --> MV4 --> DV

IV3 --> MV1 --> DV
IV3 --> MV2 --> DV
IV3 --> MV3 --> DV
IV3 --> MV4 --> DV

My questions regarding the test are:

1) When i draw the path model in smartpls3, should i connect
IV1 --> DV,
IV2 -- > DV,
IV3 --> DV too?

2) What is the difference between total indirect effect and specific indirect effect? If specific indirect effect are mostly not significant (pvalue), but total indirect effect is significant, does it means there is mediation or not?

3) I read about decision tree in Zhao 2010. I understand that a&b are indirect effects while c is direct effect. ( a = IV -> MV, b= MV -> DV, and c = IV -> DV). However, which value is actually a, b and c? Are the values are the original sample?

4) How to get direct effect? I understand total effect = total indirect + direct effect. Which value should i minus to get direct effect?

I hope i can get answers. I've been watching youtube videos too but I don't quite understand. Thank you..

Re: Mediation testing

Posted: Sun Apr 12, 2020 4:48 pm
by jmbecker
1) If you want to test a proper mediation, you would need to connect the IV and DV too.

2) Yes and no. If the specific indirect effect is not significant, it means that the mediation through a specific mediator cannot be concluded.
The total indirect effect is the combined indirect effect through all mediators at the same time. It makes only sense to analyse this if you also have the direct effect (IV --> DV) in place. It might indicate that there is some form of mediation, but each separate mediation might be too weak.

3) In the bootstrapping these are the original sample coefficients, yes.

4) You get the direct effect from IV --> DV in a model where the mediator MV is also included.