How can I include control variables in smartpls?

Questions about the implementation and application of the PLS-SEM method, that are not related to the usage of the SmartPLS software.
Post Reply
uge1985
PLS Junior User
Posts: 4
Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2012 2:00 pm
Real name and title:

How can I include control variables in smartpls?

Post by uge1985 »

For example sex, age or level of studies.

Thanks!!
allenjia
PLS Senior User
Posts: 22
Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2011 6:43 am
Real name and title:

Post by allenjia »

I remembered Dr. Bido once mentioned two methods. I do it in this way:

If your variable have n levels, such as high, mediem, low. You need to use n-1 dummy code variables to represent. For example, use one dummy code variable to represent gender, Male-1 for male and 0 for female.

For catergorized variable such as age, for example 16-20, 21-25……I think we need to use the median to represent each scale. For example, if the respondant chose 21-25, it will be replaced by 23. Some other variables like company size also need to be treated like this.

Other method maybe is group anlysis? You can search for it.
Do the formative by using PLS!!
User avatar
Diogenes
PLS Super-Expert
Posts: 899
Joined: Sat Oct 15, 2005 5:13 pm
Real name and title:
Location: São Paulo - BRAZIL
Contact:

Post by Diogenes »

Hi,

If you just want to remove the effect of the control variables:
- create (n-1) dummy for the n categories of the nominal control variable.
- include in the model a formative LV with these dummy
- run a model just with the control variable, run the complete model, compare the R2 chance to assess the contribution of the predictors.

A didactical example is available at:
FALK, R. F.; MILLER, N. B. A Primer for Soft Modeling. Ohio: The University of Akron Press, 1992.

If you want to assess the results for each level of the nominal control variable, the best way is the multi-group analysis.


Best regards,

Bido
ruchi
PLS Expert User
Posts: 75
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2010 3:09 pm
Real name and title:

Post by ruchi »

Dear Sir

In my model my main dependent variable is behavioral intention i..e BI. and there are 4 variables(Var1, var2 , var3 and Var 4) which effects this BI. The Var1, var2 variables are also endogenous variables i..e they are getting effected by 2 variables each

Var1, var2 , var3 and Var 4 are directly linked to BI (an arrow pointing towards BI)

varX, varY both are directly linked to Var 1 and var 2.


Now for controlling for AGE and GENDER, I should connect the link to BI only or to all the endogenous variables in the model (i..e BI, var1 and Var2)



Thanks
Ruchi
User avatar
Diogenes
PLS Super-Expert
Posts: 899
Joined: Sat Oct 15, 2005 5:13 pm
Real name and title:
Location: São Paulo - BRAZIL
Contact:

Post by Diogenes »

Hi,

A “control variable” is a variable that affects the dependent variable, but it is not used as independent variable.
If we do not include the control variables, the relation between ID and DV should be underestimated or overestimated.
For these reasons I think that you should connect the control variable just to the dependent variables.

Best regards,
Bido
ruchi
PLS Expert User
Posts: 75
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2010 3:09 pm
Real name and title:

Post by ruchi »

Dear Sir

Thank you for the answer.
When i ran my model with the control variable (age), most of the paths are significant (all same as in the model without control variable ) except one path. Also the path of age to the dependent variable (DV) is significant. It means that there is direct effect of age on DV. Am i right ?
It means that all the paths which are significant are regardless of age whatever the age may be these significant paths will be significant.
Let me know if I am wrong

Now i to do multigroup analysis i divided age into 3 groups ( with sample size of each group as 380, 59 and 87) and ran the same model ( i.e without control variable- age) for these 3 groups.
Now i found that majority of the paths are significant in first group , few in second group and only one in third group )

I have a doubt that if i m controlling for age and the paths are significant in the overall model with control variable then why the paths are becoming insignificant in the third age group subsample.?

Thanks
Ruchi
User avatar
Hengkov
PLS Super-Expert
Posts: 1599
Joined: Sun Apr 24, 2011 10:13 am
Real name and title: Hengky Latan
Location: AMQ, Indonesia
Contact:

Post by Hengkov »

Hi,
For analysis PLS-MGA with three group is difficult. I think you can used rondommization test for it.
Best Regards,
Hengky
Post Reply