Hai
I have two second-order LVs in my model - type 1 and type 4 respectively. How do I calculate the minimum sample size requirement for my model given that these second-order LVs are present? Apart from these two, I have a first order reflective and a first order formative LV. Further, the second-order type 1 LV mentioned above is endogenous while all others are exogenous.
Also, it would be of great help if someone could give the validation methods for these second-order LVs. Please point me to some literature for the same.
Thanks!
Vidhula
Sample size - Second Order & Validation
- Hengkov
- PLS Super-Expert
- Posts: 1599
- Joined: Sun Apr 24, 2011 10:13 am
- Real name and title: Hengky Latan
- Location: AMQ, Indonesia
- Contact:
Hi,
For calculate sample size minimum required, used ten-times rule or used G*Power and similiar software.
For conduct hierarchical model, used repeated indicators or two-stage approach.
I provide some literature for future readings:
Noonan, R., and Wold. 1983. Evaluation School System using PLS. Evaluation in Education, Pargamon.
Wetszel et al., 2009. Hierarchical models in MISQ
Becker et al., 2012. Hierarchical models in LRP.
Hair et al., 2013. A primer on PLS-SEM (Book)
Latan, H., and Ghozali, I. 2012. PLS with SmartPLS (Book).
Regards,
For calculate sample size minimum required, used ten-times rule or used G*Power and similiar software.
For conduct hierarchical model, used repeated indicators or two-stage approach.
I provide some literature for future readings:
Noonan, R., and Wold. 1983. Evaluation School System using PLS. Evaluation in Education, Pargamon.
Wetszel et al., 2009. Hierarchical models in MISQ
Becker et al., 2012. Hierarchical models in LRP.
Hair et al., 2013. A primer on PLS-SEM (Book)
Latan, H., and Ghozali, I. 2012. PLS with SmartPLS (Book).
Regards,
I think that will have to do. I have already read the LRP article. Moving on to Wetzels et al now. Hope that will answer my questions :) As for the book, given that it was so highly recommended, I have already ordered it. Would definitely be a keeper any which way! :)
Thanks a ton. This forum has been my lifeline with respect to the methodology! You guys do amazing work. Thanks again!
Regards
Vidhula
Thanks a ton. This forum has been my lifeline with respect to the methodology! You guys do amazing work. Thanks again!
Regards
Vidhula
Hi,vidhula wrote:I think that will have to do. I have already read the LRP article.
LRP article is good.
You should see the PLS Handbook Chapter by Wilson.
http://www.springer.com/statistics/comp ... 40-32825-4
Using PLS to Investigate Interaction Effects Between
Higher Order Branding Constructs
regards
Brad
Bradley Wilson. Ph.D.
Senior Lecturer in Advertising.
RMIT University.
School of Media and Communication.
GPO Box 2476V
Location. 9.5.20
Melbourne. Victoria.
Australia.
SEE FOR PUBLICATIONS
www.rmit.edu.au/staff/bradleywilson
Senior Lecturer in Advertising.
RMIT University.
School of Media and Communication.
GPO Box 2476V
Location. 9.5.20
Melbourne. Victoria.
Australia.
SEE FOR PUBLICATIONS
www.rmit.edu.au/staff/bradleywilson