Theory of Planned Behavior Path Analysis

Questions about the implementation and application of the PLS-SEM method, that are not related to the usage of the SmartPLS software.
Post Reply
IsabelleS
PLS Junior User
Posts: 1
Joined: Fri Jul 31, 2020 1:06 pm
Real name and title: Isabelle Schuite

Theory of Planned Behavior Path Analysis

Post by IsabelleS »

Hi everyone,

This is my first time using SmartPLS and I am trying to create a path analysis for my theory of planned behaviour (TPB) model.
This model consists of 6 latent variables, divided over three stages/orders as displayed here:
4 latent variables ---> 1 latent variable ---> 1 latent variable

My question is regarding the second and third stage in this model. I've seen some videos that put the indicators of the latent variables presented in the first stage, on the second stage, and all those indicators of the second stage on the last stage. These videos however do not add any other indicators to the second and third stage, whereas I am adding additional indicators to each of the latent variables.
Therefore my question is, is it necessary to add in the indicators of the preceding stage to the next one?

Kind regards,

Isabelle
jmbecker
SmartPLS Developer
Posts: 1284
Joined: Tue Mar 28, 2006 11:09 am
Real name and title: Dr. Jan-Michael Becker

Re: Theory of Planned Behavior Path Analysis

Post by jmbecker »

I would think that you want to address the sequence of effects and not really stages as in a higher-order model. Thus, you simply draw the model with your sequence of constructs.
Dr. Jan-Michael Becker, BI Norwegian Business School, SmartPLS Developer
Researchgate: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Jan_Michael_Becker
GoogleScholar: http://scholar.google.de/citations?user ... AAAJ&hl=de
Post Reply