Stop Criterion Changes

Questions about the implementation and application of the PLS-SEM method, that are not related to the usage of the SmartPLS software.
Post Reply
Choukri
PLS Expert User
Posts: 114
Joined: Thu Apr 16, 2015 2:11 pm
Real name and title: Choukri MENIDJEL

Stop Criterion Changes

Post by Choukri »

Hi,
Sorry, how can I understand if the stop criterion of the algorithm was reached and not the maximum number of iterations or not?
jmbecker
SmartPLS Developer
Posts: 1287
Joined: Tue Mar 28, 2006 11:09 am
Real name and title: Dr. Jan-Michael Becker

Re: Stop Criterion Changes

Post by jmbecker »

Well you see the number of Iterations in the report "Stop Criterion Changes" (number of rows). If the number of Iterations was smaller than the maximum number of iterations defined, the algorithem stopped because of the stop criterion.
Dr. Jan-Michael Becker, BI Norwegian Business School, SmartPLS Developer
Researchgate: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Jan_Michael_Becker
GoogleScholar: http://scholar.google.de/citations?user ... AAAJ&hl=de
Choukri
PLS Expert User
Posts: 114
Joined: Thu Apr 16, 2015 2:11 pm
Real name and title: Choukri MENIDJEL

Re: Stop Criterion Changes

Post by Choukri »

Thank you Dr. Jan-Michael Becker for your help

The stop criterion (10^-x): 7 is defined in smartpls algorithm, when I use my conceptual model with main effects; and after runing PLS algorithm, the number of rows (Stop Criterion Changes) will be 6. and when I use my conceptual model with main + moderating effects; the number of rows (Stop Criterion Changes) will be 3.

Is the number 6 (number of rows) sufficient?
How about the number 3 (number of rows) of moderating effects?

Thank again Dr. Jan-Michael Becker
jmbecker
SmartPLS Developer
Posts: 1287
Joined: Tue Mar 28, 2006 11:09 am
Real name and title: Dr. Jan-Michael Becker

Re: Stop Criterion Changes

Post by jmbecker »

It says that your model converges in 3 or 6 iterations. That is good (fast)! The longer it takes (the more iterations) the higher is the likelihood for problems in your model.
Dr. Jan-Michael Becker, BI Norwegian Business School, SmartPLS Developer
Researchgate: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Jan_Michael_Becker
GoogleScholar: http://scholar.google.de/citations?user ... AAAJ&hl=de
Choukri
PLS Expert User
Posts: 114
Joined: Thu Apr 16, 2015 2:11 pm
Real name and title: Choukri MENIDJEL

Re: Stop Criterion Changes

Post by Choukri »

You are so kind Doctor,
Thank you
Choukri
PLS Expert User
Posts: 114
Joined: Thu Apr 16, 2015 2:11 pm
Real name and title: Choukri MENIDJEL

Re: Stop Criterion Changes

Post by Choukri »

Good morning,

In the paper (A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling) that you added a vedio on (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Uwo2cBtT_xo)

The authors ,in the table 6, utilized the following expretion: CI.900 [0.612;0.652]
I understand that CI means “Confidence Intervals”, but I do not understand what the two values [0.612;0.652] mean?

Where do I find them in smartPLS

Tank you Sir
Choukri
PLS Expert User
Posts: 114
Joined: Thu Apr 16, 2015 2:11 pm
Real name and title: Choukri MENIDJEL

Re: Stop Criterion Changes

Post by Choukri »

Good morning,

The authors, Henseler et al. (2015), P. 129, in the table 6, utilized the following expretion: CI.900 [0.612;0.652]
I understand that CI means “Confidence Intervals”, but I do not understand what the two values [0.612;0.652] mean?
Where do I find them in smartPLS
Tank you
User avatar
cringle
SmartPLS Developer
Posts: 818
Joined: Tue Sep 20, 2005 9:13 am
Real name and title: Prof. Dr. Christian M. Ringle
Location: Hamburg (Germany)
Contact:

Re: Stop Criterion Changes

Post by cringle »

It's the lower and the upper bound of the confidence interval.
Choukri
PLS Expert User
Posts: 114
Joined: Thu Apr 16, 2015 2:11 pm
Real name and title: Choukri MENIDJEL

Re: Stop Criterion Changes

Post by Choukri »

Thank you Professor for your help

CI.900 [0.612;0.652]
Does CI.900 mean CI 90% ?
if it is yes.
Does the bootstrapping calculat CI automatically with 90% or what?

Thank you
User avatar
cringle
SmartPLS Developer
Posts: 818
Joined: Tue Sep 20, 2005 9:13 am
Real name and title: Prof. Dr. Christian M. Ringle
Location: Hamburg (Germany)
Contact:

Re: Stop Criterion Changes

Post by cringle »

Sure 90% - and that's what SmartPLS computes. More info on confidence intervals: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Confidence_interval
Choukri
PLS Expert User
Posts: 114
Joined: Thu Apr 16, 2015 2:11 pm
Real name and title: Choukri MENIDJEL

Re: Stop Criterion Changes

Post by Choukri »

Great Professor
Thank you
Choukri
PLS Expert User
Posts: 114
Joined: Thu Apr 16, 2015 2:11 pm
Real name and title: Choukri MENIDJEL

Re: Stop Criterion Changes

Post by Choukri »

Hi,
To calculate Confidence Intervals, should I use bootstrapping with one-tailed or two tailed
Thank you
Choukri
PLS Expert User
Posts: 114
Joined: Thu Apr 16, 2015 2:11 pm
Real name and title: Choukri MENIDJEL

Re: Stop Criterion Changes

Post by Choukri »

Hi everyone,

I have found that the researchers have used the following expretion in their articles, [based on t(4999), one-tailed test], why do they not use this one [based on t(5000), one-tailed test]

I look forward to hear your responds
Thank you
User avatar
Hengkov
PLS Super-Expert
Posts: 1599
Joined: Sun Apr 24, 2011 10:13 am
Real name and title: Hengky Latan
Location: AMQ, Indonesia
Contact:

Re: Stop Criterion Changes

Post by Hengkov »

Post Reply