Question on LV method and repeated indicator approach

Questions about the implementation and application of the PLS-SEM method, that are not related to the usage of the SmartPLS software.
Post Reply
dhenderson17
PLS User
Posts: 15
Joined: Wed Dec 06, 2006 12:49 am
Real name and title:

Question on LV method and repeated indicator approach

Post by dhenderson17 »

Hello all,

I have read over the posts on this forum and I have two questions about the mechanics of the LV method and the repeated indicators approach. My research model has 7 first order reflective constructs which lead into 2 second order formative constructs, which then leads into 1 third order formative construct.

With the LV approach, I have seen others use Principal Components Analysis (PCS) used to calculate the weights for the first order factor on the second order factor. My question is: is it better to use PCA in SPSS to calculate the weights for the first order factors on the second order factor? If SPSS were used to calculate the weights, would I then look at the Component Matrix to find the weights for the first order factors on the second order factors?

As for the repeated indicators approach, is it better to repeat the indicators for the second and third order factors using Mode A or Mode B? Because the first order constructs are reflective, I would use Mode A. However, the second and third order factors in my model are formative. From what I've seen on this forum, it seems like Mode B is preferable unless there is multicollinearity among the first order and second order factors. In that case, Mode A seems preferable.

Thanks for any help you can provide.

Thanks!

Dave
viswadatta
PLS Expert User
Posts: 139
Joined: Wed Jul 05, 2006 1:43 pm
Real name and title:
Location: Coimbatore, India

use of spss

Post by viswadatta »

you need not use spss. solve the entire model in PLS
Post Reply