CFA using PLS
CFA using PLS
I have one latent variable with a number of items used to measure it. When I do a CFA using LISREL, I do not get a good fit due to the non-normality of the data (That is what I suspect). Is it valid to do something similar using PLS by making 2 entities of the latent variable and making the one exogenous and the other endogenous? The outer loadings and composite reliability are then inspected.
-
- PLS Expert User
- Posts: 139
- Joined: Wed Jul 05, 2006 1:43 pm
- Real name and title:
- Location: Coimbatore, India
goodness of fit
In PLS we do not look at GFI, AGFI etc separately for each construct. Here, we draw the entire model and look at the following quality parameters
1. Reliability >0.7
2. Ave>0.5
3. Composite reliability >0.7
4. Communality >0.5
5. Average of ave values of constructs > correlation between constructs
We also do not consider error correlations in the model.
I hope this answers your query
Vivek
1. Reliability >0.7
2. Ave>0.5
3. Composite reliability >0.7
4. Communality >0.5
5. Average of ave values of constructs > correlation between constructs
We also do not consider error correlations in the model.
I hope this answers your query
Vivek
- Diogenes
- PLS Super-Expert
- Posts: 899
- Joined: Sat Oct 15, 2005 5:13 pm
- Real name and title:
- Location: São Paulo - BRAZIL
- Contact:
Hi,
some references in viewtopic.php?t=293
Discriminant Validity ==> Root square of AVE > correlation between LVs
(Average of ave values of constructs > correlation between constructs ==> is more restricted because Average < Root Square)
Best regards
Bido
some references in viewtopic.php?t=293
Discriminant Validity ==> Root square of AVE > correlation between LVs
(Average of ave values of constructs > correlation between constructs ==> is more restricted because Average < Root Square)
Best regards
Bido