I run the model on two subsamples. I get different results of path coefficients' significance in the subsamples. Yet, if I calculate t-test of path differences using Chin formula, I often get t-test insignificant. Hence, in one subsample the path is significant, in the other it is not, but overall the difference between them is not significant (being affected by SE of both subsamples). How do I intepret such results?
I will appreciate any clues. Best. Sergeja
group comparisons
- cringle
- SmartPLS Developer
- Posts: 818
- Joined: Tue Sep 20, 2005 9:13 am
- Real name and title: Prof. Dr. Christian M. Ringle
- Location: Hamburg (Germany)
- Contact:
Hi,
if you use the search function of this forum, you find at least two interesting threads that might be useful to you:
viewtopic.php?t=229&highlight=multigroup
viewtopic.php?t=152&highlight=multigroup
Best
Christian
if you use the search function of this forum, you find at least two interesting threads that might be useful to you:
viewtopic.php?t=229&highlight=multigroup
viewtopic.php?t=152&highlight=multigroup
Best
Christian
Prof. Dr. Christian M. Ringle, Hamburg University of Technology (TUHH), SmartPLS
- Literature on PLS-SEM: https://www.smartpls.com/documentation
- Google Scholar: https://scholar.google.de/citations?use ... AAAJ&hl=de
- Literature on PLS-SEM: https://www.smartpls.com/documentation
- Google Scholar: https://scholar.google.de/citations?use ... AAAJ&hl=de