IPMA - Include LVs with non-significant total effect ?
Posted: Sun Aug 11, 2019 10:56 pm
Hi
When asessing structural model relationships, what happen if some LVs’ total effects (importance) are non-significant explaining the target LV? Do I have to include them in the IPMA? Does this make sense?
Another issue... Negative total effects are included in the map as "negative" or as "absolute values" ? I think I have to include them as absolute values, since the purpose is to compare their relative importance with other constructs. Is this correct?
Thank you in advance
When asessing structural model relationships, what happen if some LVs’ total effects (importance) are non-significant explaining the target LV? Do I have to include them in the IPMA? Does this make sense?
Another issue... Negative total effects are included in the map as "negative" or as "absolute values" ? I think I have to include them as absolute values, since the purpose is to compare their relative importance with other constructs. Is this correct?
Thank you in advance