Reliability and Validity for Multi Group Analysis

Questions about the implementation and application of the PLS-SEM method, that are not related to the usage of the SmartPLS software.
Post Reply
ilovedu2000
PLS Junior User
Posts: 3
Joined: Mon Aug 21, 2017 1:19 pm
Real name and title: Kevin Kim

Reliability and Validity for Multi Group Analysis

Post by ilovedu2000 »

Dear professors and professionals

I know that SmartPLS 3.0 provides MGA functions. And it is very easy and usaufull.

The procedure of analysis using SmartPLS requires reliability test and validity test. Therefore we should provide result of reliability test and validity test.


There is a research model

Money -----------------------> Happy
|
|
Gender

Money is exogenous latent variable
Happy is endogenous latent variable
Gender is moderation variable



In this case, should I provide reliability & validity test result for full sample and each male and female sample? Or just providing full sample result is good for it?

The most of research papers I read provide not reliability & validity test result for sub sample but reliability & validity test result for full sample .


In conclusion, I would like to know that when I run the MGA, it is necessary reliability & validity test for sub sample??

Thanks
jmbecker
SmartPLS Developer
Posts: 1284
Joined: Tue Mar 28, 2006 11:09 am
Real name and title: Dr. Jan-Michael Becker

Re: Reliability and Validity for Multi Group Analysis

Post by jmbecker »

Given that you have measurement invariance it is okay to just report the reliability and validity criteria for the combined sample.
Dr. Jan-Michael Becker, BI Norwegian Business School, SmartPLS Developer
Researchgate: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Jan_Michael_Becker
GoogleScholar: http://scholar.google.de/citations?user ... AAAJ&hl=de
ilovedu2000
PLS Junior User
Posts: 3
Joined: Mon Aug 21, 2017 1:19 pm
Real name and title: Kevin Kim

Re: Reliability and Validity for Multi Group Analysis

Post by ilovedu2000 »

Thank you very much professor jmbecker!!


And,,, how can I know that whether my research model has measurement invariance or not ??


jmbecker wrote:Given that you have measurement invariance it is okay to just report the reliability and validity criteria for the combined sample.
jmbecker
SmartPLS Developer
Posts: 1284
Joined: Tue Mar 28, 2006 11:09 am
Real name and title: Dr. Jan-Michael Becker

Re: Reliability and Validity for Multi Group Analysis

Post by jmbecker »

Have a look at the following references:
Henseler, J., C. M. Ringle, C.M. and M. Sarstedt (2016). Examining the measurement invariance of composite models using variance-based structural equation modeling. International Marketing Review, 33(3), 405-431.
Schlägel, C. and M. Sarstedt (2016). Assessing the measurement invariance of the four-dimensional cultural intelligence scale across countries: A composite model approach, European Management Journal, 34(6), 633–649.

SmartPLS 3 provides the nessesary information within the permutation approach.
Dr. Jan-Michael Becker, BI Norwegian Business School, SmartPLS Developer
Researchgate: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Jan_Michael_Becker
GoogleScholar: http://scholar.google.de/citations?user ... AAAJ&hl=de
ilovedu2000
PLS Junior User
Posts: 3
Joined: Mon Aug 21, 2017 1:19 pm
Real name and title: Kevin Kim

Re: Reliability and Validity for Multi Group Analysis

Post by ilovedu2000 »

Thank you professor jmbecker!!

Let me study what you recommend!!

Thank you!!


jmbecker wrote:Have a look at the following references:
Henseler, J., C. M. Ringle, C.M. and M. Sarstedt (2016). Examining the measurement invariance of composite models using variance-based structural equation modeling. International Marketing Review, 33(3), 405-431.
Schlägel, C. and M. Sarstedt (2016). Assessing the measurement invariance of the four-dimensional cultural intelligence scale across countries: A composite model approach, European Management Journal, 34(6), 633–649.

SmartPLS 3 provides the nessesary information within the permutation approach.
Post Reply