Reliability of the PLS questianire

Questions about the implementation and application of the PLS-SEM method, that are not related to the usage of the SmartPLS software.
Post Reply
Ck007
PLS Junior User
Posts: 2
Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2017 12:57 pm
Real name and title: Ck007

Reliability of the PLS questianire

Post by Ck007 »

Nunnally (1978) offered a rule of thumb of 0.7 of Cronbach's Alpha to confirm the reliability of the indicators in the Likert scale questionnaire over pilot Survey. As my model is in formative nature which built upon after comprehensive literature review and expert analyses is it required to do a pilot study to confirm reliability through Cronbach's Alpha estimation. My questions are (a) can Nunnally (1978) rule of thumb of 0.7 of Cronbach's Alpha is applicable to the reliability since formative indicators are not correlated and (b) Do I need to carry out pilot survey
User avatar
cringle
SmartPLS Developer
Posts: 818
Joined: Tue Sep 20, 2005 9:13 am
Real name and title: Prof. Dr. Christian M. Ringle
Location: Hamburg (Germany)
Contact:

Re: Reliability of the PLS questianire

Post by cringle »

Pilot studies are always great. But you do not need Cronbach's alpha for formative constructs. Please read this book on the model assessment: https://www.smartpls.com/documentation/ ... s-sem-book

Kind regards
Christian
Post Reply