PLS for experimental design

Questions about the implementation and application of the PLS-SEM method, that are not related to the usage of the SmartPLS software.
Post Reply
ancaagp
PLS Junior User
Posts: 6
Joined: Sun Jul 02, 2017 7:09 am
Real name and title: Anca

PLS for experimental design

Post by ancaagp »

Hello,
I have used an experimental design in my thesis, where I manipulated 6 types of service failure.
My hypotheses say that each type of failure has an impact on a type of attribution (external or internal).

Now I don't know how to include the 6 manipulations in the project -> should I create 6 different projects for each group?
OR should I use Failure type as categorical variable and create 6 groups out of it?

I don't know how to proceed with my model..
Thank you in advance for your help.
Anca
jmbecker
SmartPLS Developer
Posts: 1284
Joined: Tue Mar 28, 2006 11:09 am
Real name and title: Dr. Jan-Michael Becker

Re: PLS for experimental design

Post by jmbecker »

The best way is to include the different manipulations (groups) using dummy variables. You should think about, which comparisons are most important and construct corresponding dummy coded variables.
Dr. Jan-Michael Becker, BI Norwegian Business School, SmartPLS Developer
Researchgate: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Jan_Michael_Becker
GoogleScholar: http://scholar.google.de/citations?user ... AAAJ&hl=de
ancaagp
PLS Junior User
Posts: 6
Joined: Sun Jul 02, 2017 7:09 am
Real name and title: Anca

Re: PLS for experimental design

Post by ancaagp »

Thank you, Jan Michael, for the reply.
Should I then have the 6 variables for failure type, each with values 0,1, and connect them to the attribution variable?
I tried this and I get the Singular Matrix Problem.
jmbecker
SmartPLS Developer
Posts: 1284
Joined: Tue Mar 28, 2006 11:09 am
Real name and title: Dr. Jan-Michael Becker

Re: PLS for experimental design

Post by jmbecker »

If you include dummy variables, you alsways have one less then you have groups. The remaining group is the reference group to which differences are calculated (the group has zero on all variables).
Dr. Jan-Michael Becker, BI Norwegian Business School, SmartPLS Developer
Researchgate: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Jan_Michael_Becker
GoogleScholar: http://scholar.google.de/citations?user ... AAAJ&hl=de
ancaagp
PLS Junior User
Posts: 6
Joined: Sun Jul 02, 2017 7:09 am
Real name and title: Anca

Re: PLS for experimental design

Post by ancaagp »

Thank you. I will look deeper into that.
I thought that PLS doesn't work well with dummy variables, but good to know that I can explore it more.
jmbecker
SmartPLS Developer
Posts: 1284
Joined: Tue Mar 28, 2006 11:09 am
Real name and title: Dr. Jan-Michael Becker

Re: PLS for experimental design

Post by jmbecker »

It does not work well if the dummy (binary variable) is a dependent variable as this requires logit models. PLS is based on regressions. Hence, dummies are similar as in a regression analysis (they work well as independent, but not as dependent).
Dr. Jan-Michael Becker, BI Norwegian Business School, SmartPLS Developer
Researchgate: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Jan_Michael_Becker
GoogleScholar: http://scholar.google.de/citations?user ... AAAJ&hl=de
ancaagp
PLS Junior User
Posts: 6
Joined: Sun Jul 02, 2017 7:09 am
Real name and title: Anca

Re: PLS for experimental design

Post by ancaagp »

Hi,
In my model the dummies are independent and attribution is dependent.
Post Reply