I have two questions in regard to variance explained in one's PLS-SEM model:
1. In the circles representative of each (endogenous) latent construct, should the R^2 OR adjusted R^2 values be displayed?
2. If adjusted R^2 values should be displayed, I'm assuming they should also be the values reported on in the body of one's results?
Thank you.
Reporting Variance Explained in Models
-
- SmartPLS Developer
- Posts: 1284
- Joined: Tue Mar 28, 2006 11:09 am
- Real name and title: Dr. Jan-Michael Becker
Re: Reporting Variance Explained in Models
It depends on your field and expectation of reviewer of your paper/thesis.
Some research like to see normal R², some both, some only adjusted R². Best approach is usually to report both in the main body of the paper.
However, only if you have a large number of independent variables it really makes a difference. If you have only a few predictors, you could also report R²
Some research like to see normal R², some both, some only adjusted R². Best approach is usually to report both in the main body of the paper.
However, only if you have a large number of independent variables it really makes a difference. If you have only a few predictors, you could also report R²
Dr. Jan-Michael Becker, BI Norwegian Business School, SmartPLS Developer
Researchgate: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Jan_Michael_Becker
GoogleScholar: http://scholar.google.de/citations?user ... AAAJ&hl=de
Researchgate: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Jan_Michael_Becker
GoogleScholar: http://scholar.google.de/citations?user ... AAAJ&hl=de