Hello,
I have a question concerning the HTMT- criteria:
1. Reviewers have advised me to use the HTMT criterion instead of Fornell-Larcker criteria. At first glance, this seems to be not a big deal because after bootstrapping the values are presented to me. I have received one item for each value. Every value is below 1. So everything is fine. Is it common to present every value in the paper?
In other paper, I saw that only the HTMT criteria for every construct and not for every item are presented. Unfortunately, I do not see only a value for the whole constructs. Can anyone help me?
Best regards,
Michael
HTMT
-
MichaelKnight
- PLS Junior User
- Posts: 5
- Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2016 3:56 pm
- Real name and title: M. Sc. Michael Schulte
-
cringle
- SmartPLS Developer
- Posts: 818
- Joined: Tue Sep 20, 2005 9:13 am
- Real name and title: Prof. Dr. Christian M. Ringle
- Location: Hamburg (Germany)
- Contact:
Re: HTMT
Please take a look at page 129 of this paper, which shows a good example on how to report HTMT results
Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A New Criterion for Assessing Discriminant Validity in Variance-based Structural Equation Modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115-135. http://link.springer.com/article/10.100 ... 014-0403-8
Best
Christian
Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A New Criterion for Assessing Discriminant Validity in Variance-based Structural Equation Modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115-135. http://link.springer.com/article/10.100 ... 014-0403-8
Best
Christian
Prof. Dr. Christian M. Ringle, Hamburg University of Technology (TUHH), SmartPLS
- Literature on PLS-SEM: https://www.smartpls.com/documentation
- Google Scholar: https://scholar.google.de/citations?use ... AAAJ&hl=de
- Literature on PLS-SEM: https://www.smartpls.com/documentation
- Google Scholar: https://scholar.google.de/citations?use ... AAAJ&hl=de