HI every body
As you now first step in structural model is testing for Collinearity issues. I am using PLS 3 and i saw that PLS 3 can calculate it directly and no need to use spss as we did before for PLS 2. it is true ? and how can interpret the result?
Collinearity Statistic

 PLS Junior User
 Posts: 1
 Joined: Mon Sep 15, 2014 8:20 am
 Real name and title: ALIREZA ROUSTASEKEHRAVANI PHD STUDENT

 SmartPLS Developer
 Posts: 1142
 Joined: Tue Mar 28, 2006 11:09 am
 Real name and title: Dr. JanMichael Becker
Re: Collinearity Statistic
Yes it is true. In SmartPLS 3 you get the collinearity statistics for the inner and outer model. No need for SPSS anymore. You interpret the VIF like you did in SPSS.
Dr. JanMichael Becker, University of Cologne, SmartPLS Developer
Researchgate: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Jan_Michael_Becker
GoogleScholar: http://scholar.google.de/citations?user ... AAAJ&hl=de
Researchgate: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Jan_Michael_Becker
GoogleScholar: http://scholar.google.de/citations?user ... AAAJ&hl=de

 PLS User
 Posts: 19
 Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2011 3:49 pm
 Real name and title:
Re: Collinearity Statistic
Dear All,
I was just wondering whether you are using R2 or the corrected R2 for the calculation of VIF values shown in the output of smartpls 3.0.
Many thanks in advance for your reply.
Best regards,
Judith
I was just wondering whether you are using R2 or the corrected R2 for the calculation of VIF values shown in the output of smartpls 3.0.
Many thanks in advance for your reply.
Best regards,
Judith
Re: Collinearity Statistic
Hello,
I am new to SmartPLS 3. As both inner and outer model's collinearity readings are given by the algorithm, I am not sure which one should I report. Based on my reading of the PLSSEM book, I need to assess the collinearity among the predictor constructs, for every set of the subpart of the structural model.
Accordingly, I thought I should report the outer model's collinearity readings. But, when I looked at the output of the SmartPLS 3 , I am confused as the output provides individual VIF readings for each of the indicators. Whereas, if I calculated manually as required when using the SmartPLS 2, the readings are for the constructs rather than individual indicators.
Does this, means that I should just report the inner model's VIF readings for each of the latent construct included in the structural model?
Thanks and regards,
Saudah
I am new to SmartPLS 3. As both inner and outer model's collinearity readings are given by the algorithm, I am not sure which one should I report. Based on my reading of the PLSSEM book, I need to assess the collinearity among the predictor constructs, for every set of the subpart of the structural model.
Accordingly, I thought I should report the outer model's collinearity readings. But, when I looked at the output of the SmartPLS 3 , I am confused as the output provides individual VIF readings for each of the indicators. Whereas, if I calculated manually as required when using the SmartPLS 2, the readings are for the constructs rather than individual indicators.
Does this, means that I should just report the inner model's VIF readings for each of the latent construct included in the structural model?
Thanks and regards,
Saudah

 SmartPLS Developer
 Posts: 1142
 Joined: Tue Mar 28, 2006 11:09 am
 Real name and title: Dr. JanMichael Becker
Re: Collinearity Statistic
VIF statistics are important for the inner model and formative outer (measurement) models.
If you have only reflective measures, then using only the inner model VIFs is ok.
If you also have formative measures, then you should assess the VIFs of the indicators of the formative measures as well.
Generally, you get one VIF for each predictor in a regression. Hence, you have VIFs for all indicators in the outer model and for all constructs in the inner model. Sometimes people report only the highes VIF per regression (per dependent), yet the VIFs of the other predictors might be informative as well. I would always report all VIFs and not only the highest.
With regard to PLS you will find good information of VIF assessment in Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., and Sarstedt, M. 2014. A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLSSEM), Sage: Thousand Oaks.
If you have only reflective measures, then using only the inner model VIFs is ok.
If you also have formative measures, then you should assess the VIFs of the indicators of the formative measures as well.
Generally, you get one VIF for each predictor in a regression. Hence, you have VIFs for all indicators in the outer model and for all constructs in the inner model. Sometimes people report only the highes VIF per regression (per dependent), yet the VIFs of the other predictors might be informative as well. I would always report all VIFs and not only the highest.
With regard to PLS you will find good information of VIF assessment in Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., and Sarstedt, M. 2014. A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLSSEM), Sage: Thousand Oaks.
Dr. JanMichael Becker, University of Cologne, SmartPLS Developer
Researchgate: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Jan_Michael_Becker
GoogleScholar: http://scholar.google.de/citations?user ... AAAJ&hl=de
Researchgate: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Jan_Michael_Becker
GoogleScholar: http://scholar.google.de/citations?user ... AAAJ&hl=de
Re: Collinearity Statistic
Thank you very much Dr. Becker for the clear and helpful answer.
Now I realised that I got confused because I forgot about the need to assess VIF of formative constructs. My model contains only reflective constructs.
So, only the inner VIFs are relevant.
I will report all VIFs given in the output.
Thanks again.
Saudah
Now I realised that I got confused because I forgot about the need to assess VIF of formative constructs. My model contains only reflective constructs.
So, only the inner VIFs are relevant.
I will report all VIFs given in the output.
Thanks again.
Saudah