Page 1 of 1
common method variance
Posted: Tue Nov 30, 2010 5:41 pm
I am struggling with common method variance. Is there any practicable, recommendable way to assess it (next to Harmans one factor test)? Any advice is highly welcome.
Posted: Wed Dec 01, 2010 8:36 am
Posted: Wed Dec 01, 2010 8:52 am
Please also check following post:
Posted: Tue Dec 07, 2010 1:30 pm
A more recent version of our PLS CMV paper can be found at
It contains a better explanation on how to use our method.
This paper will be presented in ICIS 2010 MISQ Workshop and then will be submitted to journal.
Paper on CMV
Posted: Tue Jun 14, 2011 4:24 pm
Unfortunately, the link provided is no longer accessible. As I am very interested in the approach, where could I find the mentioned paper?
Thanks very much in advance!
Posted: Wed Jun 15, 2011 1:12 am
http://wweb.uta.edu/management/Dr.Caspe ... iation.pdf
Assimilation of enterprise systems: the effect of institutional pressures and the mediating role of top management
MIS Quarterly Vol. 31 No. 1, pp. 59-87/March 2007
Posted: Tue Jul 05, 2011 6:03 pm
"Assimilation of enterprise systems: the effect of institutional pressures and the mediating role of top management
MIS Quarterly Vol. 31 No. 1, pp. 59-87/March 2007 "
This method does not really work at all. There is a paper forthcoming in MISQ that actually tests this method with simulated data with known amount of method variance and concludes that the Liang et al approach should not be used.
Posted: Wed Jul 06, 2011 8:00 pm
thank you very much for the information!
http://www.misq.org/skin/frontend/defau ... stract.pdf
Posted: Sun Jul 17, 2011 1:18 pm
The latest version of our paper on method variance with PLS can be found now at
The correct citation for this is
Rönkkö, Mikko and Jukka Ylitalo (2011) "PLS marker variable approach to diagnosing and controlling for method variance". Forthcoming in the proceedings of ICIS 2011
Edit: The paper can now be found at ICIS 2011 proceedings online
http://aisel.aisnet.org/icis2011/procee ... methods/8/