When not to use PLSc?

Questions about the implementation and application of the PLS-SEM method, that are not related to the usage of the SmartPLS software.
Post Reply
MLindsay
PLS Junior User
Posts: 1
Joined: Wed Feb 03, 2016 1:15 am
Real name and title: Dr. Mark Lindsay

When not to use PLSc?

Post by MLindsay »

Hi,

I am working on a study with a very simple model with one exogenous and one endogenous construct. The exogenous construct has 8 reflective indicators and the endogenous construct has 5 reflective indicators. The sample size is 214 at this time. Is PLSc warranted in this case, or is basic PLS okay to use? The loadings are very nice in basic PLS, but some drop below acceptable levels using PLSc.

Please advise.

Thank you for any assistance you can offer.

Mark
User avatar
cringle
SmartPLS Developer
Posts: 818
Joined: Tue Sep 20, 2005 9:13 am
Real name and title: Prof. Dr. Christian M. Ringle
Location: Hamburg (Germany)
Contact:

Re: When not to use PLSc?

Post by cringle »

If you like to mimic common factor models (and CB-SEM), PLSc and fit measures may be useful:
https://www.smartpls.com/documentation/ ... ith-cb-sem

If you use composite models, you may just want to use PLS; also PLSc can be used to estmate a model that uses both common factor models and composite models. For the decision, which proxy you would use for a latent variable (composite or common factor), you may find this article useful:
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/ar ... 6316304404

Best
Christian
Post Reply