Sarstedt et al. (2011) approach for MGA

Questions about the implementation and application of the PLS-SEM method, that are not related to the usage of the SmartPLS software.
Post Reply
AAljabr
PLS Expert User
Posts: 35
Joined: Wed Jan 06, 2016 11:52 pm
Real name and title: Abdulrahman Aljabr

Sarstedt et al. (2011) approach for MGA

Post by AAljabr »

Hi all,

I have one question regarding using the approach proposed by Sarstedt et al. 2011. The question is that when checking whether the path coefficient of one group falls in the confidence interval of the another group, should I use the path coefficient of the original sample (O) or the path coefficient of the Sample mean (M)?

Thanks

Sarstedt, M., Henseler, J., & Ringle, C. M. (2011). Multigroup analysis in partial least squares (PLS) path modeling: Alternative methods and empirical results. Advances in International Marketing, 22(1), 195-218.
jmbecker
SmartPLS Developer
Posts: 1284
Joined: Tue Mar 28, 2006 11:09 am
Real name and title: Dr. Jan-Michael Becker

Re: Sarstedt et al. (2011) approach for MGA

Post by jmbecker »

I think we have discussed this elsewhere in the forum: Do not use the confidence set approach. One problem is that confidence intervals are allowed to overlap to a certain degree if you want to test on a 5% level.
Dr. Jan-Michael Becker, BI Norwegian Business School, SmartPLS Developer
Researchgate: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Jan_Michael_Becker
GoogleScholar: http://scholar.google.de/citations?user ... AAAJ&hl=de
AAljabr
PLS Expert User
Posts: 35
Joined: Wed Jan 06, 2016 11:52 pm
Real name and title: Abdulrahman Aljabr

Re: Sarstedt et al. (2011) approach for MGA

Post by AAljabr »

Dear Dr. Becker,

Thank you very much.

I will consider other methods.
Post Reply