Hi all,
I have one question regarding using the approach proposed by Sarstedt et al. 2011. The question is that when checking whether the path coefficient of one group falls in the confidence interval of the another group, should I use the path coefficient of the original sample (O) or the path coefficient of the Sample mean (M)?
Thanks
Sarstedt, M., Henseler, J., & Ringle, C. M. (2011). Multigroup analysis in partial least squares (PLS) path modeling: Alternative methods and empirical results. Advances in International Marketing, 22(1), 195-218.
Sarstedt et al. (2011) approach for MGA
-
- SmartPLS Developer
- Posts: 1284
- Joined: Tue Mar 28, 2006 11:09 am
- Real name and title: Dr. Jan-Michael Becker
Re: Sarstedt et al. (2011) approach for MGA
I think we have discussed this elsewhere in the forum: Do not use the confidence set approach. One problem is that confidence intervals are allowed to overlap to a certain degree if you want to test on a 5% level.
Dr. Jan-Michael Becker, BI Norwegian Business School, SmartPLS Developer
Researchgate: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Jan_Michael_Becker
GoogleScholar: http://scholar.google.de/citations?user ... AAAJ&hl=de
Researchgate: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Jan_Michael_Becker
GoogleScholar: http://scholar.google.de/citations?user ... AAAJ&hl=de
-
- PLS Expert User
- Posts: 35
- Joined: Wed Jan 06, 2016 11:52 pm
- Real name and title: Abdulrahman Aljabr
Re: Sarstedt et al. (2011) approach for MGA
Dear Dr. Becker,
Thank you very much.
I will consider other methods.
Thank you very much.
I will consider other methods.