I have got the following dilemma. When I used traditional PLS I got AVE (average variance explained) of 0.62 for a construct, but when I used consistent PLS I get 0.46 for the same construct.
Is there any suggestion for a form of words that can be used to justify proceeding with the analysis on the basis of AVE of 0.46?
Average variance explained less than 0.5
-
dwaikat@kth.se
- PLS Junior User
- Posts: 1
- Joined: Tue Dec 16, 2014 10:31 am
- Real name and title: Nidal Dwaikat, PhD. Candidate