CTA-PLS using the Two-Stage Approach
Posted: Wed Nov 20, 2019 10:16 am
Hello,
I would like to use CTA-PLS for specifying a higher-order construct. In "Advanced issues in PLS" (Hair et al. 2018, p. 54) there is a recommendation for employing the two-stage approach in this case. As the tow-stage approach uses the standardized latent variable scores, I am not sure if the interpretation of the CTA-PLS results is the same with this approach? Attached you find my results and my conclusion.
"As more than one of the construct’s tetrads is significantly different from 0, the null hypothesis is rejected and a formative measurement specification between the first- and the second-order constructs is confirmed (Hair et al. 2019a)."
Thank you very much in advance!
Best,
Jennifer
I would like to use CTA-PLS for specifying a higher-order construct. In "Advanced issues in PLS" (Hair et al. 2018, p. 54) there is a recommendation for employing the two-stage approach in this case. As the tow-stage approach uses the standardized latent variable scores, I am not sure if the interpretation of the CTA-PLS results is the same with this approach? Attached you find my results and my conclusion.
"As more than one of the construct’s tetrads is significantly different from 0, the null hypothesis is rejected and a formative measurement specification between the first- and the second-order constructs is confirmed (Hair et al. 2019a)."
Thank you very much in advance!
Best,
Jennifer