VAF

Questions about the implementation and application of the PLS-SEM method, that are not related to the usage of the SmartPLS software.
Post Reply
tinker18
PLS Junior User
Posts: 8
Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2018 1:33 pm
Real name and title: tinker

VAF

Post by tinker18 »

Hello everyone,

I have three mediators in my model; Two of it are partial mediation and 1 full mediation. The full mediation shows a VAF value of 1.075 which is above 100%. I know that VAF is not required for full mediation but I'd like to know if I am calculating it correctly?

A= Independent variable, B = dependent variable, M = mediator.

A to M = 0.552
M to C = 0.469
A to B= -0.018

Therefore,
0.552 x 0.469 / (0.552 x 0.469 + (-0.018)) = 1.075%

However, according to a friend, we need to consider only the absolute value and disregard the negative sign. That is,
0.552 x 0.469 / (0.552 x 0.469 + 0.018) = 93.49%.

May I know which calculation is correct?

Thank you.
jmbecker
SmartPLS Developer
Posts: 1282
Joined: Tue Mar 28, 2006 11:09 am
Real name and title: Dr. Jan-Michael Becker

Re: VAF

Post by jmbecker »

Your calculations seem to be generally correct. However, a problem with the VAF is that it does not work with negative effects (indirect or direct). Some people propose to only use the absolute effects to circumvent these problems, but the main question is: what do you want to measure with the VAF and why?
Dr. Jan-Michael Becker, BI Norwegian Business School, SmartPLS Developer
Researchgate: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Jan_Michael_Becker
GoogleScholar: http://scholar.google.de/citations?user ... AAAJ&hl=de
Post Reply