PLS/SmartPLS and Unidimensionality

This forum is closed, and read-only.
Locked
ighulammustafa
PLS Junior User
Posts: 6
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2013 4:44 pm
Real name and title:

PLS/SmartPLS and Unidimensionality

Post by ighulammustafa »

What if the unidimensionality criteria is not satisfied? How should one handle such a situation? From the literature,

"Unidimensionality is usually satisfied by retaining the items whose loadings are above 0.7". (Reference Needed)

"To measure the assumption of unidimensionality, Cronbach’s alpha is the most common method. The value of the Cronbach’s alpha should be greater than .7 to measure the assumption of unidimensionality." (Reference Needed)

"In factor analysis, to measure the assumption of unidimensionality, the cutoff value of the factor loading should be higher than .3, or eigenvalue should be greater than 1." (Reference Needed)

I have a construct with 5 measurement items. The loading values are 0.5282, 0.9063, 0.3489, 0.4478, and 0.477. The cronbach's alpha is 0.6346, and the composite reliability is 0.6865. If I start to exclude the items from the construct (based on the loading value < 0.7), I'm left with just one item -- the loading values don't go above 0.7 for any other item (except the one with 0.9063). How should I handle this case?

EDIT:

I have another construct with 3 measurement items with loading values of 0.2443, 0.4386, and 0.9602. The cronbach's alpha is 0.5073, and the composite reliability is 0.5965.

The model consists for 6 constructs. 2 out of 6 have unidimensionality issue.
User avatar
Hengkov
PLS Super-Expert
Posts: 1599
Joined: Sun Apr 24, 2011 10:13 am
Real name and title: Hengky Latan
Location: AMQ, Indonesia
Contact:

Post by Hengkov »

Hi,
For development construct, outer loadings 0.4-0.5 acceptable.
But for testing must 0.6-0.7.
Check data outliers for solve this problem.
Your respondent give bad answer.

Regards,
Locked