Hello, dear All!
I read in the a lot of articles the information concerning that the researches should use PLS-SEM, if the model contains formative constructs. But, unfortunately, I could not find information why exactly CB SEM cannot analyse formative constructs. It would be highly appreciated if you could give me some explanation about this issue. I would be very grateful for any feedback!
about Formative constructs
- Hengkov
- PLS Super-Expert
- Posts: 1599
- Joined: Sun Apr 24, 2011 10:13 am
- Real name and title: Hengky Latan
- Location: AMQ, Indonesia
- Contact:
Hi,
Some reason:
1. All software CB-SEM cannot handle formative construct (original develop just for reflective construct)
2. CB-SEM goal for confirmatory research, suitable with classical test theory (just for mode A).
3. Model non-identified if formative construct in CB-SEM.
4. MIMIC model develop in CB-SEM for handle formative construct, but this method have some problem.
5. PLS best approach for handle formative construct.
Best Regards,
Hengky
Some reason:
1. All software CB-SEM cannot handle formative construct (original develop just for reflective construct)
2. CB-SEM goal for confirmatory research, suitable with classical test theory (just for mode A).
3. Model non-identified if formative construct in CB-SEM.
4. MIMIC model develop in CB-SEM for handle formative construct, but this method have some problem.
5. PLS best approach for handle formative construct.
Best Regards,
Hengky
- Hengkov
- PLS Super-Expert
- Posts: 1599
- Joined: Sun Apr 24, 2011 10:13 am
- Real name and title: Hengky Latan
- Location: AMQ, Indonesia
- Contact:
Hi Lilie,
Many literature explain it, but check some references below:
Bollen, K. A., and Lennox, R. 1991. “Conventional Wisdom on Measurement: A Structural Equation Perspective,”Psychological Bulletin (110:2), pp. 305-314.
Bollen, K. A. 1989. Structural Equations with Latent Variables,
New York: Wiley.
Bollen, K. A. 2011. “Evaluating Effect, Composite, and Causal Indicators in Structural Equation Models,” MIS Quarterly (35:2), pp. 359-372.
Cenfetelli, R.T., and Bassellier, G. 2009. INTERPRETATION OF FORMATIVE MEASUREMENT IN INFORMATION SYSTEMS RESEARCH in MISQ (33:4), pp. 689-707.
Diamantopoulos, A. 2011. “Incorporating Formative Measures Into Cavarinace-Based Structural Equation Models,” MIS Quarterly (35:2), pp. 335-358.
Goodhue, D., Lewis, W., and Thompson, R. 2012. “COMPARING PLS TO REGRESSION AND LISREL: A RESPONSE TO MARCOULIDES, CHIN, AND SAUNDERS ,” MIS Quarterly (36:3), pp. 703-716.
Kline, R. B. (2012). “Assumptions in structural equation modeling,”. In R. Hoyle (Ed.), Handbook of structural equation modeling. New York: Guilford, pp.111-125.
Schumacker, R.E., and Lomax, R.G. 2010. A Begginer’s Guide to Structural Equation Modeling. Third Edition, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
And also check special issue formative construct in psychological method and journal of business research.
Best Regards,
Hengky
Many literature explain it, but check some references below:
Bollen, K. A., and Lennox, R. 1991. “Conventional Wisdom on Measurement: A Structural Equation Perspective,”Psychological Bulletin (110:2), pp. 305-314.
Bollen, K. A. 1989. Structural Equations with Latent Variables,
New York: Wiley.
Bollen, K. A. 2011. “Evaluating Effect, Composite, and Causal Indicators in Structural Equation Models,” MIS Quarterly (35:2), pp. 359-372.
Cenfetelli, R.T., and Bassellier, G. 2009. INTERPRETATION OF FORMATIVE MEASUREMENT IN INFORMATION SYSTEMS RESEARCH in MISQ (33:4), pp. 689-707.
Diamantopoulos, A. 2011. “Incorporating Formative Measures Into Cavarinace-Based Structural Equation Models,” MIS Quarterly (35:2), pp. 335-358.
Goodhue, D., Lewis, W., and Thompson, R. 2012. “COMPARING PLS TO REGRESSION AND LISREL: A RESPONSE TO MARCOULIDES, CHIN, AND SAUNDERS ,” MIS Quarterly (36:3), pp. 703-716.
Kline, R. B. (2012). “Assumptions in structural equation modeling,”. In R. Hoyle (Ed.), Handbook of structural equation modeling. New York: Guilford, pp.111-125.
Schumacker, R.E., and Lomax, R.G. 2010. A Begginer’s Guide to Structural Equation Modeling. Third Edition, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
And also check special issue formative construct in psychological method and journal of business research.
Best Regards,
Hengky