Search found 811 matches
- Sun Jan 13, 2019 3:17 pm
- Forum: Method and application
- Topic: HTMT discriminant validity
- Replies: 21
- Views: 37944
Re: HTMT discriminant validity
Thanks. Use the one or the other approach but with 5,000 bootstrap samples. However, your upper bound is above 1 which means that discriminant validity has not been established. Your confidence intervals are very wide. I suppose that you use a small sample (which would be a data problem) and/or a fu...
- Sun Jan 13, 2019 2:32 pm
- Forum: Method and application
- Topic: HTMT discriminant validity
- Replies: 21
- Views: 37944
Re: HTMT discriminant validity
You would like to do a one-sided test (or use a 10% probability of error with the 2-sided test) to obtain the upper bound at the 95% point (and not at 97.5%.
- Sun Jan 13, 2019 1:55 pm
- Forum: Method and application
- Topic: FIMIX exploratory variable
- Replies: 3
- Views: 13731
Re: FIMIX exploratory variable
You may exclude the potential explanatory variables form the model before running FIMIX-PLS. @FIMIX-PLS and segmentation: The book on advanced PLS-SEM issues by Hair et al. (2018) has a chapter on this topic: https://www.smartpls.com/documentation/learn-pls-sem-and-smartpls/book-on-advanced-pls-sem-...
- Sun Jan 13, 2019 1:43 pm
- Forum: SmartPLS 3 - Small Talk Corner
- Topic: reflective-reflective second order construct
- Replies: 6
- Views: 18412
Re: reflective-reflective second order construct
Thanks. To get started on second-order models, you may want to take a look at the respective chapter in the book advanced PLS-SEM issues by Hair et al. (2018): https://www.smartpls.com/documentation/learn-pls-sem-and-smartpls/book-on-advanced-pls-sem-issues "To begin with, in my Ph.D. thesis mo...
- Sun Jan 13, 2019 1:37 pm
- Forum: SmartPLS 3 - Small Talk Corner
- Topic: Different results in SmartPLS 3
- Replies: 13
- Views: 30849
Re: Different results in SmartPLS 3
Just double-click on the data-set in SmartPLS 3.
- Sun Jan 13, 2019 1:33 pm
- Forum: Method and application
- Topic: HTMT discriminant validity
- Replies: 21
- Views: 37944
Re: HTMT discriminant validity
Well, it's a little bit high. Can you get it below 0.9? Otherwise, bootstrap the HTMT (use complete bootstrapping in SmartPLS 3) and show that the HTMT is significantly lower than 1 (look at the upper bound of HTMT's bootstrap confidence interval).
Best
Christian
Best
Christian
- Sun Dec 23, 2018 1:59 pm
- Forum: Method and application
- Topic: Bonferroni
- Replies: 4
- Views: 3417
Re: Bonferroni
This is not a PLS-specific but general concern. Please search for articles, books, and webpages that address the multiple testing issues. In multiple testing situations, we need to adjust the accepted probability of error level. When using the Bonferroni correction to account for 6 comparisons, the ...
- Sat Dec 15, 2018 11:04 am
- Forum: Method and application
- Topic: Help! Compositional invariance established but both original mean and variance outside the confidence intervals
- Replies: 2
- Views: 10158
Re: Help! Compositional invariance established but both original mean and variance outside the confidence intervals
Then, you established partial invariance and can compare the standardized group-specific coefficients: https://www.emeraldinsight.com/doi/abs/ ... -2014-0304
- Mon Dec 03, 2018 10:11 am
- Forum: Literature
- Topic: Pure Moderator in Smart PLS
- Replies: 1
- Views: 71479
Re: Pure Moderator in Smart PLS
Just include the moderator variable in your model, select the target construct, right-click and select the "Add interaction term" option. Here, you find a chapter on moderation in PLS-SEM: https://www.smartpls.com/documentation/learn-pls-sem-and-smartpls/pls-sem-book Also take a look at th...
- Mon Dec 03, 2018 10:09 am
- Forum: Method and application
- Topic: PLS PREDICT RESULT
- Replies: 5
- Views: 4802
Re: PLS PREDICT RESULT
Please upload a screenshot of your model (with results) and the PLSpredict results table.
- Mon Dec 03, 2018 10:06 am
- Forum: Method and application
- Topic: Sample size: minimum R2 method
- Replies: 6
- Views: 16014
Re: Sample size: minimum R2 method
In principle, you are on the right track. In the second edition of the book, the explications have been slightly modified. Here, one looks at an effect size level and the required sample size. The attached pictures provide further explications. Please note that these are technical considerations. Re...
- Fri Nov 23, 2018 3:20 pm
- Forum: Method and application
- Topic: Usage of Rho_A reliability coefficient
- Replies: 7
- Views: 43563
Re: Usage of Rho_A reliability coefficient
A rho_A value above 1 is strange and should not occur. You may revert to Cronbach's alpha in that case.
- Fri Nov 02, 2018 12:59 pm
- Forum: SmartPLS 3 - Small Talk Corner
- Topic: Problem with Importing Data (Missing Values) from SAV to CSV to SmartPLS
- Replies: 3
- Views: 14742
Re: Problem with Importing Data (Missing Values) from SAV to CSV to SmartPLS
When the data export from SPSS includes such values "4,64E+09", SmartPLS 3 cannot correctly read the data file. "E" is a string and SmartPLS 3 only expects values. The rule for SmartPLS data: Only use text in the first row (i.e., the header which contains the variable names); som...
- Mon Mar 26, 2018 10:25 pm
- Forum: Method and application
- Topic: One Reflective and Five Formative Construct Model
- Replies: 1
- Views: 2235
Re: One Reflective and Five Formative Construct Model
Thanks. Usually, you only need to assess discriminant validity for two and more reflective constructs in a PLS path model.
Best
CR
Best
CR
- Wed Feb 21, 2018 3:25 pm
- Forum: SmartPLS 3 - Small Talk Corner
- Topic: SmartPLS Data Analysis
- Replies: 1
- Views: 4216