Exactly what you say: the t value of the outer loading (which usually are very high). But you should rather use the 95% bias-corrected and accelerated (BCa) bootstrap confidence intervals for significance resting (and report those results).
Regards
Christian
Search found 811 matches
- Wed Feb 21, 2018 3:24 pm
- Forum: Method and application
- Topic: T-statistic difference in Path Coefficient and Outer Loading
- Replies: 3
- Views: 4938
- Wed Feb 21, 2018 3:21 pm
- Forum: Method and application
- Topic: Permutation test significance (PLS-MGA)
- Replies: 1
- Views: 2508
Re: Permutation test significance (PLS-MGA)
Your choice. What don't your revert to p < 0.05.
Kind regards
Christian
Kind regards
Christian
- Wed Feb 21, 2018 3:18 pm
- Forum: SmartPLS 3 - Small Talk Corner
- Topic: Hair Jr. et al (2017) A primer on...edition 2e
- Replies: 1
- Views: 4030
Re: Hair Jr. et al (2017) A primer on...edition 2e
They are not significant. But this does not mean you need to remove these items. If you read the book, you will find that you need to inspect the outer loadings next. Since they are above 0.5 you want to keep these items. In general, you may want to keep theoretically established items even though t...
- Tue Jan 23, 2018 11:43 am
- Forum: Method and application
- Topic: Invariance model assessment for reflective measurement model
- Replies: 3
- Views: 12129
Re: Invariance model assessment for reflective measurement m
Thanks, I already received your other email which I responded to.
Best
CR
Best
CR
- Tue Jan 23, 2018 11:41 am
- Forum: SmartPLS 2 - FAQ
- Topic: Licence Key
- Replies: 1
- Views: 59232
Re: Licence Key
You automatically receive a confirmation mail where need to click the confirmation link to receive the key.
- Tue Jan 23, 2018 11:39 am
- Forum: Method and application
- Topic: MICOM
- Replies: 1
- Views: 2499
Re: MICOM
Thanks! (1) You need to compare the original correlation value with the lower bound of the confidence interval. (2) The the original result is 0.996 and would be lower than 0.997 you would reject the null hypothesis of equal correlations on the 5% level. How about running more permutations (e.g. 500...
- Tue Jan 23, 2018 11:30 am
- Forum: Method and application
- Topic: Can i modify the results of my moderating effect
- Replies: 1
- Views: 2596
Re: Can i modify the results of my moderating effect
We strongly suggest not to "torture" methods until it confesses what you expect. In case of your situation, the coefficients are so small that no variations would lead to a different solution. The problem may be with your data. Please check them again (or collect more data). But if the dat...
- Sun Jan 14, 2018 5:17 pm
- Forum: Method and application
- Topic: negative sample mean value
- Replies: 1
- Views: 2571
Re: negative sample mean value
Obviously, your data has negative values. But this negative data is positively correlated with something else.
Best
CR
Best
CR
- Sun Jan 14, 2018 5:10 pm
- Forum: Method and application
- Topic: Multigroup Analysis with 4 Groups (OTG)
- Replies: 5
- Views: 8599
Re: Multigroup Analysis with 4 Groups (OTG)
Hi, you seem to interpret the Bonferroni correction correctly. You would the adjusted probability of error level for your assessment. In PLS-SEM a similar case is the confirmatory tetrad analysis. Here, to judge if a measurement model is reflective or formative, one needs to look at multiple tests p...
- Fri Jan 05, 2018 12:14 pm
- Forum: SmartPLS 3 - Requested Features
- Topic: 30-days trial
- Replies: 6
- Views: 68632
Re: 30-days trial
Well, things may take up to 24 or 48 hours depending on the number of pending requests. I am sure that you will receive a response, soon.
- Fri Jan 05, 2018 11:23 am
- Forum: SmartPLS 3 - Requested Features
- Topic: 30-days trial
- Replies: 6
- Views: 68632
Re: 30-days trial
Please take a look here: https://www.smartpls.com/faq/license-an ... tion/trial
If there is an activation problem, please send a message to support@smartpls.com
Best
Christian
If there is an activation problem, please send a message to support@smartpls.com
Best
Christian
- Wed Jan 03, 2018 2:54 pm
- Forum: Method and application
- Topic: Hypothesized Models in Published Research
- Replies: 1
- Views: 2086
Re: Hypothesized Models in Published Research
Hi Ryan You may want to take a look at published PLS-SEM articles in high ranked journals, especially in your discipline. They may serve you as a blueprint. Here you find some PLS-SEM review studies across different disciplines that would be a good start: https://www.smartpls.com/documentation/liter...
- Wed Jan 03, 2018 2:49 pm
- Forum: Method and application
- Topic: Brand Equity
- Replies: 1
- Views: 3407
Re: Brand Equity
Both questions require your theoretical reasoning based on prior publications. Hence, you need to conduct a literature review on brand equity constructs. A good start may be to search for the keywords "PLS" and "brand equity". For the discussion about formative and reflective, yo...
- Wed Jan 03, 2018 2:42 pm
- Forum: Ongoing and Future Research
- Topic: Descriptive Analysis?
- Replies: 1
- Views: 61679
Re: Descriptive Analysis?
Hmmh, you may ask your supervisor for clarification. S/he may want you to do a moderator analysis or multigroup analysis using the age or the education variables, which would not be uncommon for a TAM model. Also, you may consider conducting an importance-performance map analysis (IPMA). Best regard...
- Fri Dec 15, 2017 7:11 am
- Forum: Ongoing and Future Research
- Topic: Composite Vs. common factor
- Replies: 2
- Views: 64070
Re: Composite Vs. common factor
Also, check this recent open-access article on the CB-SEM and PLS-SEM debate: Rigdon, E. E., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2017). On Comparing Results from CB-SEM and PLS-SEM. Five Perspectives and Five Recommendations. Marketing ZFP, 39(3), 4-16. https://rsw.beck.de/docs/librariesprovider54/de...