Hi Hengkov,
I am thinking what if I take the average means of all formative indicators and make it as global single-item (marker or Measured Latent Merker Variable-MLMV)? Does it make sense?
How can I decide my global single-item measure as I have almost in the last stage of analysis.
BR, Murad
Search found 74 matches
- Sun Sep 01, 2013 7:54 am
- Forum: Method and application
- Topic: Common method bias, never use Liang et al.'s method????
- Replies: 3
- Views: 4926
- Tue Aug 20, 2013 12:12 pm
- Forum: SmartPLS 2 - FAQ
- Topic: Hierarchical Factor Model in SmartPLS: Confusing!
- Replies: 6
- Views: 6676
Re: Hierarchical Factor Model in SmartPLS: Confusing!
Yeah you are missing some further steps. check this tutorial on youtube and you will find the answer. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kPeUTKjMF7o Also read it. Becker, J.-M., Klein, K., & Wetzels, M. (2012). Hierarchical Latent Variable Models in PLS-SEM: Guidelines for Using Reflective-Formative...
- Wed Aug 14, 2013 4:29 pm
- Forum: Method and application
- Topic: Low R2 when reflective, high when formative?
- Replies: 2
- Views: 2289
Re: Low R2 when reflective, high when formative?
Hi - I have a couple of latent variables, where I have a weak theoretical idea whether they should be formative or reflective, theoretically I can go with either/or. When I right-click in Smart-PLS and inverts the measurement models I find that the R2 is 0,3 when reflective and 0,6 when formative? ...
- Wed Aug 14, 2013 4:25 pm
- Forum: Method and application
- Topic: Smallest Path coefficient to report?
- Replies: 2
- Views: 2462
Re: Smallest Path coefficient to report?
Hi - I am working on a complex model, and I wish to reduce the number of paths. Some of the paths are strong and some are weak, - it would make some kind of sense to not include some paths. The question is, - how strong or weak can a path be for inclusion? 0,1? 0,2? Is there some kind of best pract...
- Tue Aug 13, 2013 5:05 pm
- Forum: SmartPLS 2 - FAQ
- Topic: new license key
- Replies: 6
- Views: 13030
Re: new license key
Hi,
Click on "My Key" in the right green corner and you will get your key.
Best regards,
Click on "My Key" in the right green corner and you will get your key.
Best regards,
- Sat Aug 10, 2013 7:30 am
- Forum: Method and application
- Topic: How to calculate the t-value of the indirect effect
- Replies: 1
- Views: 2201
Re: How to calculate the t-value of the indirect effect
Hi Everybody, I have one question to calculate the t-value of the indirect effect. The bootstrap results of my model are in the following. Original Sample (O) T Statistics (|O/STERR|) Sample Mean (M) X -> Y 0.13 1.78 0.13 X -> M 0.24 3.09 0.24 M -> Y 0.68 13.47 0.68 Standard Deviation (STDEV) Stand...
- Wed Aug 07, 2013 7:07 am
- Forum: Method and application
- Topic: Sobel's test
- Replies: 4
- Views: 3540
- Tue Aug 06, 2013 3:47 pm
- Forum: Method and application
- Topic: Sobel's test
- Replies: 4
- Views: 3540
Sobel's test
Please help,
Though the direct path is not significant but sobel's test is significant, so can I report it in the paper?
Though the direct path is not significant but sobel's test is significant, so can I report it in the paper?
- Sat Aug 03, 2013 7:23 am
- Forum: SmartPLS 2 - FAQ
- Topic: Reflective-Reflective endogenous second order constructs
- Replies: 6
- Views: 6083
- Fri Aug 02, 2013 3:44 am
- Forum: SmartPLS 2 - FAQ
- Topic: Reflective-Reflective endogenous second order constructs
- Replies: 6
- Views: 6083
Hi, I've learned from others that if an contruct is endogenous,then repeated indexs will lead to multicollinearity.Is it really? Hello. I agree with the above reply. Repeated indicator approach is more appropriate for reflective-reflective type model and use Mode A for hierarchical LV. Multicolline...
- Mon Jul 29, 2013 6:43 pm
- Forum: Method and application
- Topic: Calculating T-Value for indirect effects: a*b/sd(ai*bi) ?
- Replies: 18
- Views: 19532
- Sat Jul 20, 2013 5:38 am
- Forum: Method and application
- Topic: The Repeated indictor approach and the Two-step approach
- Replies: 3
- Views: 2435
- Wed Jul 17, 2013 5:11 pm
- Forum: Method and application
- Topic: The Repeated indictor approach and the Two-step approach
- Replies: 3
- Views: 2435
The Repeated indictor approach and the Two-step approach
Dear All, Am I right that estimation of higher (e,g., second) order constructs in SEM-PLS by two-step approach and estimating higher (e,g., second) order constructs not in SEM-PLS gives different results. Or in other way, can I say that The Repeated indictor approach is used when we estimate second ...
- Tue Jul 16, 2013 2:35 pm
- Forum: Method and application
- Topic: AVE of second order construct
- Replies: 2
- Views: 2232
- Mon Jul 15, 2013 4:48 pm
- Forum: Method and application
- Topic: AVE of second order construct
- Replies: 2
- Views: 2232
AVE of second order construct
Dear all,
Why the AVE of my second-order constructs are a little bit below than 0.5 but I have no problem in Fornel-Larcker criterion. Please facilitate me in this regard.
Why the AVE of my second-order constructs are a little bit below than 0.5 but I have no problem in Fornel-Larcker criterion. Please facilitate me in this regard.