Search found 4 matches
- Wed Oct 31, 2007 5:00 pm
- Forum: Method and application
- Topic: Multi-group comparisons with PLS
- Replies: 59
- Views: 66518
Interpretation of t-test of path differences
Dear all, I used Chin's formula to compare path coefficients of two groups. My puzzle is how to interpret the results: I obtain some significant paths in one group, but not in the other, yet the t-test of the differences between the parallel paths are in many instances not significant. How can I exp...
- Mon Oct 09, 2006 11:26 am
- Forum: Method and application
- Topic: group comparisons
- Replies: 1
- Views: 2609
group comparisons
I run the model on two subsamples. I get different results of path coefficients' significance in the subsamples. Yet, if I calculate t-test of path differences using Chin formula, I often get t-test insignificant. Hence, in one subsample the path is significant, in the other it is not, but overall t...
- Thu Apr 20, 2006 8:33 am
- Forum: Method and application
- Topic: differential scale width of indicators
- Replies: 3
- Views: 4671
Standardization of formative variables?
I read a paper of Tenenhause et al. (2005) in which authors argue for standardisation of variables if not on the same scaling, but under several conditions and not for formative variables. I have one formative variable that is defined on the scale from 0 to 100%, whereas other variables are reflecti...
- Thu Apr 20, 2006 8:08 am
- Forum: Method and application
- Topic: Moderators in PLS: Which modeling approach is appropriate?
- Replies: 8
- Views: 10830
Interaction between a reflective and a formative LV
I would like to estimate interaction between a formative and a reflective variable. I haven't come across any paper dealing with the interaction between two types of LV. The formative variable is a function of only one indicator. The reflective one has three indicators. If I treat the interaction as...