Search found 14 matches
- Wed Jun 27, 2018 6:55 pm
- Forum: Method and application
- Topic: Using weights from a SmartPLS model to estimate LVs in a second sample
- Replies: 2
- Views: 2690
Re: Using weights from a SmartPLS model to estimate LVs in a second sample
Thanks for your response and for the reference.
- Thu Jun 21, 2018 8:43 pm
- Forum: Method and application
- Topic: Using weights from a SmartPLS model to estimate LVs in a second sample
- Replies: 2
- Views: 2690
Using weights from a SmartPLS model to estimate LVs in a second sample
Hi all, I have estimated several SmartPLS models including a reflective dependent latent variable, behavior, and several formative independent latent variables, all of which have are measured with a number of manifest variables. I would like to use the weights from these models to estimate the depen...
- Mon Mar 30, 2015 1:24 pm
- Forum: Method and application
- Topic: SmartPLS 3.0 and small sample size
- Replies: 6
- Views: 5663
Re: SmartPLS 3.0 and small sample size
ok, thanks for the recommendation.
- Mon Mar 30, 2015 11:30 am
- Forum: Method and application
- Topic: SmartPLS 3.0 and small sample size
- Replies: 6
- Views: 5663
Re: SmartPLS 3.0 and small sample size
Thanks. I experimented some. It seems that eliminating a few indicators from one or the other of the main effects to allow the product method
yields a larger interaction term than using the two-stage approach with all of the initial indicators. Is this correct in general?
yields a larger interaction term than using the two-stage approach with all of the initial indicators. Is this correct in general?
- Sun Mar 29, 2015 1:31 pm
- Forum: Method and application
- Topic: SmartPLS 3.0 and small sample size
- Replies: 6
- Views: 5663
Re: SmartPLS 3.0 and small sample size
Hello Christian,
Thanks for the quick response. N = 97. There are four predictor LVs in the model, one with
7 indicators, the others have about 30 - 40 indicators each. We need to create interaction terms using the
seven-item LV and each of the others.
Thanks for the quick response. N = 97. There are four predictor LVs in the model, one with
7 indicators, the others have about 30 - 40 indicators each. We need to create interaction terms using the
seven-item LV and each of the others.
- Fri Mar 27, 2015 8:57 pm
- Forum: Method and application
- Topic: SmartPLS 3.0 and small sample size
- Replies: 6
- Views: 5663
SmartPLS 3.0 and small sample size
Hi all, I am testing a model in SmartPLS 2.0 and SmartPLS 3.0 The model and data are the same; the program are on different computers. In SmartPLS 3.0 when I create an interaction term of two variables I get the message that the sample size is too small, due to having more indicators in the interact...
- Fri Mar 28, 2014 4:41 pm
- Forum: Method and application
- Topic: SmartPLS and levels of analysis
- Replies: 0
- Views: 2959
SmartPLS and levels of analysis
Hi, I would like to test a two-level model with industry at the higher level and firms nested within industry. I'm interested in how industry characteristics moderate relationships between independent and dependent firm-level variables. Packages such as HLM and LISREL do this. I suspect SmartPLS won...
- Sun Jun 02, 2013 10:39 pm
- Forum: Method and application
- Topic: Copied and renamed models won't run
- Replies: 2
- Views: 2184
- Tue May 28, 2013 2:26 pm
- Forum: Method and application
- Topic: Copied and renamed models won't run
- Replies: 2
- Views: 2184
Copied and renamed models won't run
Hi all, Sometimes I copy a valid model such as "Model A," then I either use the automatic label "Copy of Model A," or I change the name, "Model B." In either case the new model (the old model with the new name) won't run and I get the message "There must be a valid...
- Sun Feb 10, 2013 2:04 pm
- Forum: Method and application
- Topic: composite reliabilities of interaction terms
- Replies: 6
- Views: 4806
interaction terms
Hi Hengky,
Wow!! This is exactly what we need. Thanks again.
Wow!! This is exactly what we need. Thanks again.
- Thu Feb 07, 2013 2:49 pm
- Forum: Method and application
- Topic: composite reliabilities of interaction terms
- Replies: 6
- Views: 4806
- Tue Feb 05, 2013 7:43 pm
- Forum: Method and application
- Topic: composite reliabilities of interaction terms
- Replies: 6
- Views: 4806
- Mon Feb 04, 2013 4:18 pm
- Forum: Method and application
- Topic: composite reliabilities of interaction terms
- Replies: 6
- Views: 4806
composite reliabilities of interaction terms
Hi all, I am testing a model with a number of LVs. The results look good in general. The main effects composite reliabilities are greater than the Cronbach's alphas, but the composite reliabilities of the interaction terms vary and some are much lower than the corresponding alphas. Why is this and w...
- Mon Apr 03, 2006 3:15 pm
- Forum: SmartPLS 2 - FAQ
- Topic: Bootstrapping Problem Calculating loadings
- Replies: 2
- Views: 2810
Bootstrapping Problem Calculating loadings
I am using SmartPLS and a fictitious dataset in a research methods course I am teaching. The means of the item loading estimates from the pseudo samples for some of the latent variables, one in particular, are much lower than the estimate from the original whole sample. The reason is that many of th...