forum.smartpls.com

Dear all, I am conducting MGA analysis by SmartPLS. I got the results of MICOM of the relationship between latent variable A and latent variable B are equal mean value and equal variance among two groups-> Full measurement Invariance of relationship between latent variable A and latent variable B am...

Dear everybody, I am doing MICOM procedure of MGA (Multigroup analysis) for more than three groups. Due to a recommendation from a paper, the setting specifications: p value should be made adjustment (Bonferroni corrections): 0.05 to 0.0169524 when executing the permutation test. However, in Permuta...

Thank you for your quick response. I can be more clear on the number of latent variables. In addition, it would be better if you could give me some papers or documents as a base for the minimum number of indicators (or for what you have denote). Thank you

Dear everybody, I am a new user for Smartpls 4. while I am doing some initial analysis, I have a question in my mind. What are the minimum number of indicators for a latent variable? Are there any requirements or procedures for number of indicators of a latent variable? Thank you for your support, I...

Thank you so much for your detailed answer. I think that I can understand much about that

Thank you for your answer. "...you cannot compare the groups (the group-specific estimates such as path coefficients), because it is not assured that the construct are measured in the same way...." Would you please explain more on measured in the same way? Here, I understand that we use th...

Dear everyone, I am a newbie and trying to conduct MICOM and MGA analysis. However, result of Stage 2 (MICOM) showed 'no' compositional invarience (compositional invarience not established). What are the optimal solution for dealing with this? I have found an article from Henseler 2016 told that &qu...