Dear Dr. Becker
Thank you very much. Your comments are greatly appreciated.
I like the suggestion to use bootstrap MGA as robust test.
Regards
Dasun
Search found 8 matches
- Sun Oct 15, 2023 1:05 am
- Forum: Method and application
- Topic: MGA for more than two groups
- Replies: 4
- Views: 2318
- Sun Oct 15, 2023 12:55 am
- Forum: Method and application
- Topic: p-value adjustment: 0.05 to 0.0169524 when executing the permutation test
- Replies: 5
- Views: 2368
Re: p-value adjustment: 0.05 to 0.0169524 when executing the permutation test
Dear Dr. Becker
Thank you very much. I greatly appreciate your explanations; they have been incredibly beneficial.
Reagrds
Dasun
Thank you very much. I greatly appreciate your explanations; they have been incredibly beneficial.
Reagrds
Dasun
- Fri Oct 13, 2023 11:31 pm
- Forum: Method and application
- Topic: p-value adjustment: 0.05 to 0.0169524 when executing the permutation test
- Replies: 5
- Views: 2368
Re: p-value adjustment: 0.05 to 0.0169524 when executing the permutation test
To be honest, I don't understand what you mean with "the significance level automatically changes from 0.017 to 0.02." If you run a (preferably permutation-based MGA), you will get a p-value for the difference in parameter between groups. You usually conclude that the difference is signif...
- Fri Oct 13, 2023 11:17 pm
- Forum: Method and application
- Topic: MGA for more than two groups
- Replies: 4
- Views: 2318
Re: MGA for more than two groups
Dear Dr. Becker Thank you very much for the reply. The paper you referred Cheah et al. (2023) uses the OTG method after the MICOM procedure. However, some sources say to conduct "Pairwise comparison and familywise error correction". Also, how to decide what procedure to run in Smart PLS (M...
- Fri Oct 13, 2023 12:11 am
- Forum: Method and application
- Topic: MGA for more than two groups
- Replies: 4
- Views: 2318
MGA for more than two groups
Hi, I am currently trying to do MGA for three groups. I have conducted MICOM procedure and only partial measurement invariance was established as equal mean values and variances is not available. I am bit confused about the next step. Should I run, Permutation MGA or Bootstrap MGA next? Also, I woul...
- Fri Oct 13, 2023 12:02 am
- Forum: Method and application
- Topic: p-value adjustment: 0.05 to 0.0169524 when executing the permutation test
- Replies: 5
- Views: 2368
Re: p-value adjustment: 0.05 to 0.0169524 when executing the permutation test
Dear everybody, I am doing MICOM procedure of MGA (Multigroup analysis) for more than three groups. Due to a recommendation from a paper, the setting specifications: p value should be made adjustment (Bonferroni corrections): 0.05 to 0.0169524 when executing the permutation test. However, in Permut...
- Thu Aug 24, 2023 11:37 pm
- Forum: Method and application
- Topic: Sample size: minimum R2 method
- Replies: 6
- Views: 16500
Re: Sample size: minimum R2 method
I think the difference lies exactly in the difference between "Linear multiple regression: Fixed Model, R2 deviation from zero" and "Linear multiple regression: Fixed Model, single regression coefficient." The first is the power of a regression models' F-test to find that the R²...
- Thu Aug 24, 2023 4:43 am
- Forum: Method and application
- Topic: Sample size: minimum R2 method
- Replies: 6
- Views: 16500
Re: Sample size: minimum R2 method
In principle, you are on the right track. In the second edition of the book, the explications have been slightly modified. Here, one looks at an effect size level and the required sample size. The attached pictures provide further explications. Please note that these are technical considerations. R...