Search found 8 matches
- Wed Mar 31, 2021 10:57 pm
- Forum: Method and application
- Topic: Interpreting Path Coefficients
- Replies: 9
- Views: 42768
Re: Interpreting Path Coefficients
Dear, please just for advice ie. clarification. When defining hypothesis in many research I see the use of different phrases "positive effect", "positive impact", "positive influence" and "positive relationship". What is the correct phrase to use? Is it correc...
- Fri Mar 19, 2021 11:06 am
- Forum: Method and application
- Topic: Interpreting effect size F squared and Q squared
- Replies: 5
- Views: 16107
Re: Interpreting effect size F squared and Q squared
Dear Mr. Becker,
thank you very much for the answer. I read the mentioned article and made the PLSpredict analysis. The results show high out-of-sample prediction.
Kind regards,
Antonija
thank you very much for the answer. I read the mentioned article and made the PLSpredict analysis. The results show high out-of-sample prediction.
Kind regards,
Antonija
- Mon Mar 15, 2021 11:32 pm
- Forum: Method and application
- Topic: Interpreting effect size F squared and Q squared
- Replies: 5
- Views: 16107
Re: Interpreting effect size F squared and Q squared
Dear, please for one explanation. I know that if my Qsquare of the endogenous construct is higher than zero that I have predictive relevance. But how do I interpret the strengths i.e. week, medium, and strong? In the material of the workshop it is written 0.02, 0.15, and 0.35 but in the articles Hai...
- Mon Mar 08, 2021 6:36 pm
- Forum: Method and application
- Topic: HTMT value higher than 1
- Replies: 5
- Views: 21895
Re: HTMT value higher than 1
Dear Dr. Becker, I have a reflective-reflective model with 4 HOC constructs that are connected with two endogenous (UTJEC and QUAL). I am using the repeated indicator approach and currently in calculating manually the HTMT. I calculated the HTMT for the connection of all 4 HOC with the two endogenou...
- Sun Mar 07, 2021 9:18 am
- Forum: Method and application
- Topic: Data Metrics - How to Standardise Raw Data - Using SmartPLS3
- Replies: 5
- Views: 14545
Re: Data Metrics - How to Standardise Raw Data - Using SmartPLS3
Dear Dr. Becker,
thank you very much for the quick answer. I corrected the database and everything is ok.
Kind regards,
Antonija
thank you very much for the quick answer. I corrected the database and everything is ok.
Kind regards,
Antonija
- Wed Mar 03, 2021 5:00 pm
- Forum: Method and application
- Topic: Data Metrics - How to Standardise Raw Data - Using SmartPLS3
- Replies: 5
- Views: 14545
Re: Data Metrics - How to Standardise Raw Data - Using SmartPLS3
Dear Dr. Becker, what If I have already standardized the data, imported them into SmartPLS, and made the whole analysis? Is it ok? I.e. is it a rule that there is no need for standardization prior to importing the data to SmartPLS3 or is it a choice ? Thank you for the question. Kind regards, Antonija
- Wed Mar 03, 2021 4:12 pm
- Forum: Method and application
- Topic: Multi-dimensional construct
- Replies: 8
- Views: 22700
Re: Multi-dimensional construct
Dear,
do you have a reference that I can use if my cronbach's alpha of a lower-order component is less than 0.6 (i.e. 0.525)? My AVE and CR are good.
Thank you very much.
Kind regards,
do you have a reference that I can use if my cronbach's alpha of a lower-order component is less than 0.6 (i.e. 0.525)? My AVE and CR are good.
Thank you very much.
Kind regards,
- Fri Feb 12, 2021 12:40 pm
- Forum: Method and application
- Topic: Usage of Rho_A reliability coefficient
- Replies: 7
- Views: 46148
Re: Usage of Rho_A reliability coefficient
Dear,
what if rho_a (for all indicators) is higher than CR?
Cronbach's are for all indicators are smaller than rho_A.
what if rho_a (for all indicators) is higher than CR?
Cronbach's are for all indicators are smaller than rho_A.