Perfect! Thank you, I found it and will just cite that then.
:)
Search found 8 matches
- Tue Mar 09, 2010 3:37 pm
- Forum: Method and application
- Topic: Degrees of freedom in bootstrap: n-1 or samples -1
- Replies: 4
- Views: 4938
- Tue Mar 09, 2010 9:20 am
- Forum: Method and application
- Topic: Degrees of freedom in bootstrap: n-1 or samples -1
- Replies: 4
- Views: 4938
Hi Stephan, thanks for your reply! I am tending towards that answer as well, but do you perhaps have a reference for that? Because, in the linked article, the authors explicitly state that the correct number of freedom is n-1 and also use this consistently to report their results. That's what's conf...
- Mon Mar 08, 2010 8:10 pm
- Forum: Method and application
- Topic: Degrees of freedom in bootstrap: n-1 or samples -1
- Replies: 4
- Views: 4938
Degrees of freedom in bootstrap: n-1 or samples -1
Dear all, which is the appropriate number for degrees of freedom when computing p values for t-statistics, e.g., in Excel? The number of bootstrap samples - 1 (e.g., 499, 999),as here and here , or the number of data points - 1 as posited in this article on p. 19 (formula) and, e.g. p.27 in the subs...
- Mon Mar 08, 2010 7:13 pm
- Forum: Method and application
- Topic: Moderation: full vs. reduced model
- Replies: 2
- Views: 2894
Moderation: full vs. reduced model
Hello everyone, I have a question regarding the analyses of moderation effects with PLS that has previously been answered inconsistently here on the forum (as far as I could find). I would appreciate if anyone could clear this up, ideally with references to published articles. When testing for moder...
- Fri Jan 29, 2010 8:56 am
- Forum: Method and application
- Topic: How to test for Common Method Variance in PLS?
- Replies: 21
- Views: 42120
I am unsure about which numbers to compare. In the Liang et al. paper, I conclude from Figure E3 that what they actually used are the path coefficients (connecting the latent first-order variables to Method and Second order variables). However, using the repeated indicator (superblock) approach, th...
- Wed Jan 27, 2010 8:05 pm
- Forum: Method and application
- Topic: How to test for Common Method Variance in PLS?
- Replies: 21
- Views: 42120
- Thu Jan 21, 2010 7:27 pm
- Forum: Method and application
- Topic: How to test for Common Method Variance in PLS?
- Replies: 21
- Views: 42120
- Tue Jan 05, 2010 6:27 pm
- Forum: Method and application
- Topic: Changing path coefficients in Fimix PLS
- Replies: 0
- Views: 1570
Changing path coefficients in Fimix PLS
Hello everyone, as a new user of smartpls, I am confused by following phenomenon occuring in my analyses: When running the FIMIX algorithm several times for the same number of classes on the same model and data, the path coefficients change (sometimes drastically). More specifically, I get the same ...