Search found 6 matches
- Tue Jun 18, 2019 10:00 am
- Forum: Method and application
- Topic: Getting N/A error while doing a consistent PLS Algorithm
- Replies: 8
- Views: 14398
Re: Getting N/A error while doing a consistent PLS Algorithm
Thank you very much for looking at the issue and explaining the problem - much appreciated!
- Fri Jun 14, 2019 12:50 pm
- Forum: Method and application
- Topic: Sample Size Requirement for Index Construction (Measurement Model)
- Replies: 1
- Views: 2127
Re: Sample Size Requirement for Index Construction (Measurement Model)
I would much appreciate an answer or any possible hint on this subject. Thank you!
- Tue Jun 11, 2019 6:59 am
- Forum: Method and application
- Topic: Getting N/A error while doing a consistent PLS Algorithm
- Replies: 8
- Views: 14398
Re: Getting N/A error while doing a consistent PLS Algorithm
Thank you, jmbecker. I don't think that it's a (multi)collinearity problem since all VIFs are between 1.19 and 1.70.
If I include the same construct (INFO with INFO1-8) in a larger model with other constructs, this problem doesn't occur.
If I include the same construct (INFO with INFO1-8) in a larger model with other constructs, this problem doesn't occur.
- Fri Jun 07, 2019 9:15 am
- Forum: Method and application
- Topic: Sample Size Requirement for Index Construction (Measurement Model)
- Replies: 1
- Views: 2127
Sample Size Requirement for Index Construction (Measurement Model)
My aim is to construct a formative measure (index) on the basis of the following hierarchical component model (HCM): one second-order construct (SOC), four first-order constructs (FOCs), and a total of 23 indicators (grouped into the 4 FOCs). (There is no structural model.) I am using the repeated i...
- Thu Jun 06, 2019 7:36 am
- Forum: Method and application
- Topic: Getting N/A error while doing a consistent PLS Algorithm
- Replies: 8
- Views: 14398
Re: Getting N/A error while doing a consistent PLS Algorithm
In this thread and the one that jmbecker has referenced (viewtopic.php?f=5&t=3531), this problem is attributed to the consistent PLS algorithm in reflective measurement. I encounter this problem also with a formative construct and the standard PLS algorithm. Are the underlying reasons the same? ...
- Tue Jun 04, 2019 11:39 am
- Forum: SmartPLS 3 - Small Talk Corner
- Topic: Validating second order formative construct
- Replies: 10
- Views: 73888
Re: Validating second order formative construct
When I estimate the (outer) weights and loadings of an HCM, SmartPLS gives me two values for each indicator: one weight / loading "from" the indicator "to" the 1st order construct (see output: CONS3 -> CONS) and one weight / loading from the indicator to the 2nd order construct (...