Search found 4 matches
- Tue Nov 26, 2019 7:09 pm
- Forum: Method and application
- Topic: CTA-PLS using the Two-Stage Approach
- Replies: 5
- Views: 51034
Re: CTA-PLS using the Two-Stage Approach
Dear Professor Becker, dear Professor Ringle, Thank you very much for your valuable feedback! I conducted the first analysis again and finally identified the errors! I also ran the IPMA and used the unstandardized latent variable scores as indicators, and the CTA results regarding the higher-order c...
- Sat Nov 23, 2019 12:58 pm
- Forum: Method and application
- Topic: CTA-PLS using the Two-Stage Approach
- Replies: 5
- Views: 51034
Re: CTA-PLS using the Two-Stage Approach
Dear Professor Ringle, Thank you very much for your help and the literature reference! I know this paper and found it very useful for specifying higher-order constructs! I actually employed the embedded two-stage approach and ran the CTA as you recommend, I was just wondering if my interpretation of...
- Wed Nov 20, 2019 10:16 am
- Forum: Method and application
- Topic: CTA-PLS using the Two-Stage Approach
- Replies: 5
- Views: 51034
CTA-PLS using the Two-Stage Approach
Hello, I would like to use CTA-PLS for specifying a higher-order construct. In "Advanced issues in PLS" (Hair et al. 2018, p. 54) there is a recommendation for employing the two-stage approach in this case. As the tow-stage approach uses the standardized latent variable scores, I am not su...
- Thu Jun 07, 2018 3:17 pm
- Forum: Method and application
- Topic: two-stage second order approach question, urgent!
- Replies: 3
- Views: 4085
Re: two-stage second order approach question, urgent!
Dear Christian Ringle, I have a similar problem as the above described, as three of my seven first-order construct scores have insignificant weights. Is it really necessary to consider this when I have done the repeated indicator approach in a first stage and checked for all quality criteria at this...