Search found 5 matches

by shash
Fri Jan 26, 2018 12:43 pm
Forum: SmartPLS 3 - Small Talk Corner
Topic: Multicollinerity for 2nd order formative construct
Replies: 1
Views: 4030

Multicollinerity for 2nd order formative construct

Hi, I face multicollinearity issue with my 2nd order formative construct. after reading some forum tracks, i used the 2 step approach. I used the original IVs with the original items and used the Latent Variables (results in reports) generated via running the PLS Algorithm for the DV (2nd order cons...
by shash
Mon Jan 22, 2018 1:42 am
Forum: Method and application
Topic: VIF for Type II second order constructs
Replies: 5
Views: 8339

Re: VIF for Type II second order constructs

Hi, I have the similar issue on the multicollinearity for my Formative Dependent Variable which is 2nd order construct. Just to double confirm, i need to use the original indicators for the other constructs/variables and just use the LV from executing the PLS algorithm for the 2nd order DV/construct...
by shash
Sun Nov 26, 2017 4:01 pm
Forum: Method and application
Topic: Need Help on Mediator Effect
Replies: 3
Views: 3933

Re: Need Help on Mediator Effect

Hi,

Great. My model works now. Just to double confirm, the reliability and validity test should be done before designing the 2-stage approach to test path coefficient right?

Thank you.
by shash
Sun Nov 26, 2017 2:54 pm
Forum: Method and application
Topic: Need Help on Mediator Effect
Replies: 3
Views: 3933

Need Help on Mediator Effect

Hi, I have done bootstrapping on my research model. I have 3 independent variables, 2 mediators, 2nd order construct DV measured by 6 formative 1st order. The others are reflective. All the paths showing t-value, except for the path from both mediators to my 2nd order DV is showing 0.0000. What does...
by shash
Sun Nov 26, 2017 12:28 am
Forum: Method and application
Topic: Discriminant Validity using the Fornell Larcker & HTMT
Replies: 1
Views: 3145

Discriminant Validity using the Fornell Larcker & HTMT

Hi, For my model, the CR and AVE has been established. However, for discriminant validity test using the Fornell Larcker criterion gives below results: A B C D E F A 0.781 B 0.485 0.757 C 0.692 0.53 0.738 D 0.656 0.454 0.792 0.714 E 0.546 0.63 0.609 0.493 0.716 F 0.662 0.56 0.67 0.567 0.542 0.749 C ...