forum.smartpls.com

Thank you for your answer! This could be interesting to think about. Still, could anyone explain the large differences when considering both the confidence intervals and the p-values described in my first post?

Thanks again and all the best!

Hello everybody, I'm currently looking at an indirect effect. For this effect, I obtained a p-value of 0.07 and a bias corrected 95% confidence interval of (0.005; 0.080). Against this backdrop, I wondered how I should interpret these results. From my point of view, looking at the p-value would impl...

Dear Dr. Becker, Thank you very much for your quick answer. Ok, I understood that I can get the unstandardized path coefficients from the IPMA. Besides, I guess I can get the mean / SD values of my independent variable by just copying the unstandardized latent variable scores, and computing mean and...

Hello everybody, I currently developed a research model that includes a binary moderator (with the values 0 and 1). For reporting my results, I seek to visualize the moderation effect using a simple slope plot. However, as the standard slope plot implemented in Smart PLS 3.2.6 includes three levels ...