Search found 4 matches
- Sun May 19, 2019 9:48 pm
- Forum: Method and application
- Topic: Interaction effect significant, both main effects not
- Replies: 10
- Views: 26081
Re: Interaction effect significant, both main effects not
I found these papers to be somehow related to this isssue: Belsky, J., Pluess, M., & Widaman, K. F. (2013). Confirmatory and competitive evaluation of alternative gene‐environment interaction hypotheses. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 54(10), 1135-1143. Grainger, J., Muneaux, M., Fa...
- Thu Jul 20, 2017 4:30 pm
- Forum: Method and application
- Topic: Interaction effect significant, both main effects not
- Replies: 10
- Views: 26081
Re: Interaction effect significant, both main effects not
@jmbecker Thanks for the kind reply.
Does anybody know a published paper, that interpreted these kind of interaction effect?
Thank you
Does anybody know a published paper, that interpreted these kind of interaction effect?
Thank you
- Sun Jul 16, 2017 5:21 pm
- Forum: Method and application
- Topic: Interaction effect significant, both main effects not
- Replies: 10
- Views: 26081
Interaction effect significant, both main effects not
Dear Community, in my PLS-Model I am using a Interaction Effect(using SmartPLS Moderating Effect). The Boostrapping Analysis shows a significant Moderation Effect, whereas both main effects are not significant. A --> X: Not significant: p-value: 0,081 / Loading: 0,150 B --> X: Not significant: p-val...
- Sat Jul 15, 2017 5:47 pm
- Forum: Method and application
- Topic: T-Test (Bootstrapping) Significance of p-Value
- Replies: 1
- Views: 2673
T-Test (Bootstrapping) Significance of p-Value
Dear all, I have a question regarding the interpretation of the Bootstrapping Results: Does a p-Value higher than 0.95, when using a two-sided t-test for a PLS-Model, shows significance for a path or not? The SmartPLS-Documentation says this is the case for PLS-Multi-Group Analysis: "[…] if the...