Thank you for your reply! I'll try to work on it as suggested.
Bests, Susanne
Search found 10 matches
- Mon Aug 13, 2018 12:47 pm
- Forum: Method and application
- Topic: Using the OTG approach to compare between 3 alternatives?
- Replies: 9
- Views: 10347
- Sat Aug 11, 2018 1:08 pm
- Forum: Method and application
- Topic: Using the OTG approach to compare between 3 alternatives?
- Replies: 9
- Views: 10347
Re: Using the OTG approach to compare between 3 alternatives?
Hi guys, I tried to proceed with the OTG test R code obtained here: https://www.pls-sem.net/downloads/advanced-issues-in-pls-sem-1/ but further questions arose. I used the R code and the previously generated bootstrap estimates from SmartPLS (5,000 bootstraps, equal across all 3 groups) to compute t...
- Fri Aug 10, 2018 5:55 am
- Forum: Method and application
- Topic: Using the OTG approach to compare between 3 alternatives?
- Replies: 9
- Views: 10347
Re: Using the OTG approach to compare between 3 alternatives?
Hi Gerhard, I struggle with the same topics and came up with the same questions. Now I have calculated the FR-Value with an self-developed Excel-Sheet. Do you mind sharing this self-developed an Excel-Sheet for the FR-values with the community here? How did you (or anyoneelse who is advanced regardi...
- Sun Mar 05, 2017 8:29 pm
- Forum: Method and application
- Topic: Second-order formative construct (exogenous)
- Replies: 2
- Views: 2666
Re: Second-order formative construct (exogenous)
Thank you for your reply. I am looking forward to the detailed insights in the topic in the upcoming book!
Bests Susanne
Bests Susanne
- Thu Feb 16, 2017 7:03 pm
- Forum: Method and application
- Topic: Second-order formative construct (exogenous)
- Replies: 2
- Views: 2666
Second-order formative construct (exogenous)
Dear all, in order to model my first-order reflective second-order formative construct, which is an exogenous variable with 5 dimensions with equal amount of items in the structural model, I followed the guidelines of Becker, Klein & Wetzels (2012), Hair et al. (2014) and Ringle, Sarstedt & ...
- Mon Jan 09, 2017 7:12 pm
- Forum: Method and application
- Topic: 2nd-order construct & AVE: smartPLS vs. manual calculation
- Replies: 2
- Views: 2794
Re: 2nd-order construct & AVE: smartPLS vs. manual calculati
Thank you very much for the detailed answer! Now, it sounds clear to me.
- Sun Jan 08, 2017 5:29 pm
- Forum: Method and application
- Topic: 2nd-order construct & AVE: smartPLS vs. manual calculation
- Replies: 2
- Views: 2794
2nd-order construct & AVE: smartPLS vs. manual calculation
Hello community, I have a first-order reflective second-order formative construct (type II) being an exogenous variable in the structural model. Its subconstructs have an unequal number of items, thus, I use the two-stage approach. In order to assess validity and reliability of the reflective subcon...
- Thu Jan 05, 2017 9:29 am
- Forum: Method and application
- Topic: HTMT necessary? Value >1 with Type II construct
- Replies: 4
- Views: 4345
Re: HTMT necessary? Value >1 with Type II construct
Thanks a lot for your opinion! It has been very helpful for deciding on the next steps of the data analysis: after merging the three highly correlated subconstructs (of which literature says that they somehow indirectly affect each other) to one more general construct leads to good VIF values (≤ 1.6...
- Wed Jan 04, 2017 5:25 pm
- Forum: Method and application
- Topic: HTMT necessary? Value >1 with Type II construct
- Replies: 4
- Views: 4345
Re: HTMT necessary? Value >1 with Type II construct
Dear Jan, thank your very much for your reply and recommendation! I really appreciate your timely and detailed answer. I agree on your explanation regarding the characteristics of second-order formative constructs and I would like to add some additional thoughts to this "hot topic": One of...
- Tue Jan 03, 2017 6:52 pm
- Forum: Method and application
- Topic: HTMT necessary? Value >1 with Type II construct
- Replies: 4
- Views: 4345
HTMT necessary? Value >1 with Type II construct
Hello all, the exogenous variable of my model is a first-oder reflective second-order formative construct (type II). I would like to use the HTMT criterion to assess discriminant validity as recommended by Henseler, Ringle & Sarstedt (2015). I detected that the HTMT values between the subconstru...