Search found 8 matches
- Fri Jun 29, 2018 8:59 pm
- Forum: Ongoing and Future Research
- Topic: PLS Predict: Questions about Information Theoretic Criteria
- Replies: 3
- Views: 65302
PLS Predict: Questions about Information Theoretic Criteria
Greetings, I am writing a paper using the PLS Predict function, as well as the information theoretic criteria advocated by Sharma et al. (forth coming) (see the following link for the Excel sheet to calculate these indices: https://www.pls-sem.net/downloads/). I am comparing multiple models in the l...
- Sun Nov 05, 2017 7:39 pm
- Forum: Method and application
- Topic: P Value in Confirmatory Tetrad Analysis (CTA)
- Replies: 2
- Views: 4288
Re: P Value in Confirmatory Tetrad Analysis (CTA)
Hi Christian, Thank you very much for your detailed response. I also read some literature on the issues around Bonferroni and thought of using an alternative method -- the one in which different levels of p value are applied to different individual tests within a given multiple test, and the stricte...
- Tue Oct 31, 2017 5:37 pm
- Forum: Method and application
- Topic: P Value in Confirmatory Tetrad Analysis (CTA)
- Replies: 2
- Views: 4288
P Value in Confirmatory Tetrad Analysis (CTA)
Hello all, I have a paper in which I used confirmatory tetrad analysis (CTA) with SmartPLS 3. When I specified statistical parameters for the analysis, I followed Gudergan et al.'s (2008) practice, and used p = .10 as the significant value. However, one of my reviewers questioned this, and asked for...
- Mon Sep 18, 2017 7:29 pm
- Forum: Method and application
- Topic: Confirmatory Tetrad Analysis to assess constructs
- Replies: 16
- Views: 21860
Re: Confirmatory Tetrad Analysis to assess constructs
Hello mnabi, I am not SmartPLS expert, but I believe that adjusted CIs reflect Bonferroni adjustments. Anyone else thoughts? Best, Shin Hello, In the table of CTA-PLS, we have confidence interval and adjusted confidence interval (CI low and up adj.). Which one should I use for analysis? Is it someth...
- Thu Jun 08, 2017 7:49 pm
- Forum: SmartPLS 3 - Small Talk Corner
- Topic: Some details about confirmatory tetrad analysis
- Replies: 1
- Views: 4097
Some details about confirmatory tetrad analysis
Hi all, I am finalizing my manuscript, where I mostly used confirmatory tetrad analysis (CTA) following Gudergan et al.'s (2008) procedures. I found one (detail) issue in one of their findings, and am wondering if anyone can jump in and address it (perhaps, I am misreading or so): In Table 5 (p. 124...
- Sun May 21, 2017 4:31 pm
- Forum: Method and application
- Topic: Confirmatory Tetrad Analysis: Help Me with Basic Questions!
- Replies: 2
- Views: 5260
Re: Confirmatory Tetrad Analysis: Help Me with Basic Questio
Dear Christian,
Thank you for your reply. Very helpful!
All the best,
Shin
Thank you for your reply. Very helpful!
All the best,
Shin
- Sat Sep 24, 2016 4:33 pm
- Forum: Method and application
- Topic: Confirmatory Tetrad Analysis: Help Me with Basic Questions!
- Replies: 2
- Views: 5260
Confirmatory Tetrad Analysis: Help Me with Basic Questions!
Greetings from Canada, I am running some confirmatory tetrad analyses (CTA), following Gudergan et al.'s (2008) procedures with SmartPLS 3. In so doing, I've got a few basic questions and am wondering if somebody could help me out! My questions are: (a) Gudergan et al. (2008) reported "residual...
- Wed Aug 17, 2016 4:16 pm
- Forum: Method and application
- Topic: Confirmatory Tetrad Analysis to assess constructs
- Replies: 16
- Views: 21860
Re: Confirmatory Tetrad Analysis to assess constructs
Greetings from Canada, I am running some confirmatory tetrad analyses (CTA), following Gudergan et al.'s (2008) procedures with SmartPLS 3. In so doing, I've got a few basic questions and am wondering if somebody could help me out! My questions are: (a) Gudergan et al. (2008) reported " residua...