## Search found 8 matches

Fri Jun 29, 2018 8:59 pm
Forum: Ongoing and Future Research
Topic: PLS Predict: Questions about Information Theoretic Criteria
Replies: 1
Views: 399

### PLS Predict: Questions about Information Theoretic Criteria

Greetings, I am writing a paper using the PLS Predict function, as well as the information theoretic criteria advocated by Sharma et al. (forth coming) (see the following link for the Excel sheet to calculate these indices: https://www.pls-sem.net/downloads/). I am comparing multiple models in the l...
Sun Nov 05, 2017 7:39 pm
Forum: Application of PLS
Topic: P Value in Confirmatory Tetrad Analysis (CTA)
Replies: 2
Views: 785

### Re: P Value in Confirmatory Tetrad Analysis (CTA)

Hi Christian, Thank you very much for your detailed response. I also read some literature on the issues around Bonferroni and thought of using an alternative method -- the one in which different levels of p value are applied to different individual tests within a given multiple test, and the stricte...
Tue Oct 31, 2017 5:37 pm
Forum: Application of PLS
Topic: P Value in Confirmatory Tetrad Analysis (CTA)
Replies: 2
Views: 785

### P Value in Confirmatory Tetrad Analysis (CTA)

Hello all, I have a paper in which I used confirmatory tetrad analysis (CTA) with SmartPLS 3. When I specified statistical parameters for the analysis, I followed Gudergan et al.'s (2008) practice, and used p = .10 as the significant value. However, one of my reviewers questioned this, and asked for...
Mon Sep 18, 2017 7:29 pm
Forum: FAQ (Methodology)
Topic: Confirmatory Tetrad Analysis to assess constructs
Replies: 16
Views: 13559

### Re: Confirmatory Tetrad Analysis to assess constructs

Hello mnabi, I am not SmartPLS expert, but I believe that adjusted CIs reflect Bonferroni adjustments. Anyone else thoughts? Best, Shin Hello, In the table of CTA-PLS, we have confidence interval and adjusted confidence interval (CI low and up adj.). Which one should I use for analysis? Is it someth...
Thu Jun 08, 2017 7:49 pm
Forum: SmartPLS Small Talk Corner
Replies: 1
Views: 1117

Hi all, I am finalizing my manuscript, where I mostly used confirmatory tetrad analysis (CTA) following Gudergan et al.'s (2008) procedures. I found one (detail) issue in one of their findings, and am wondering if anyone can jump in and address it (perhaps, I am misreading or so): In Table 5 (p. 124...
Sun May 21, 2017 4:31 pm
Forum: Application of PLS
Topic: Confirmatory Tetrad Analysis: Help Me with Basic Questions!
Replies: 2
Views: 2386

### Re: Confirmatory Tetrad Analysis: Help Me with Basic Questio

Dear Christian,

All the best,

Shin
Sat Sep 24, 2016 4:33 pm
Forum: Application of PLS
Topic: Confirmatory Tetrad Analysis: Help Me with Basic Questions!
Replies: 2
Views: 2386

### Confirmatory Tetrad Analysis: Help Me with Basic Questions!

Greetings from Canada, I am running some confirmatory tetrad analyses (CTA), following Gudergan et al.'s (2008) procedures with SmartPLS 3. In so doing, I've got a few basic questions and am wondering if somebody could help me out! My questions are: (a) Gudergan et al. (2008) reported "residual valu...
Wed Aug 17, 2016 4:16 pm
Forum: FAQ (Methodology)
Topic: Confirmatory Tetrad Analysis to assess constructs
Replies: 16
Views: 13559

### Re: Confirmatory Tetrad Analysis to assess constructs

Greetings from Canada, I am running some confirmatory tetrad analyses (CTA), following Gudergan et al.'s (2008) procedures with SmartPLS 3. In so doing, I've got a few basic questions and am wondering if somebody could help me out! My questions are: (a) Gudergan et al. (2008) reported " residual val...