Search found 4 matches
- Wed Feb 24, 2016 2:41 am
- Forum: Method and application
- Topic: Indirect effect (for a non-significant relationship)
- Replies: 2
- Views: 3608
Indirect effect (for a non-significant relationship)
My situation is: Y1-->Y3, path coefficient = 0.173; p= 0.054 Y1-->Y2, path coefficient = 0.413; p= 0.000 Y2-->Y3, path coefficient = 0.500; p= 0.000 my question is Q1. can i state the result like this: although the relationship Y1-->Y3 is not significant, Y1 has indirect effect on Y3 through Y2 (0.4...
- Thu Dec 03, 2015 1:34 pm
- Forum: Method and application
- Topic: About testing of Moderating Effect
- Replies: 2
- Views: 7317
About testing of Moderating Effect
Dear, if there is a significant relationship between A and B (A-->B), and i would like to know what is the right way to test the moderating effect (for example: gender). What test should i use? some people use (Gender * A --> B) to test moderating effect (SmartPLS 3) and some use MGA to run a t-test...
- Wed Dec 02, 2015 3:20 pm
- Forum: Ongoing and Future Research
- Topic: About Outliers
- Replies: 4
- Views: 78660
Re: About Outliers
I have run PLS, here is my findings Fullset (include outlier) Construct A: AVE =0.697 ; CR = 0.920 , Cronbach's Alpha = 0.891 Construct B: AVE = 0.756; CR = 0.925, Cronbach's Alpha = 0.892 Construct C:AVE = 0.691; CR = 0.870, Cronbach's Alpha = 0.779 Construct D:AVE = 0.887; CR = 0.959, Cronbach's A...
- Wed Dec 02, 2015 12:46 pm
- Forum: Ongoing and Future Research
- Topic: About Outliers
- Replies: 4
- Views: 78660
About Outliers
Dear all, I have a a question. My primary data has 472 observations after removal of straight lining, and I found there were more than 30 outliers (univariate outlier, manifest variable). I do not think removal of these outlier is a wise solution. Shall I keep it as a subgroup and run a multi group ...