Hi All,
Please, would it be possible to access this open-ended answer? I'm interested in the same question.
Search found 5 matches
- Sun Apr 01, 2018 5:46 pm
- Forum: Method and application
- Topic: Invariance model assessment for reflective measurement model
- Replies: 3
- Views: 12117
- Sun Aug 09, 2015 6:45 pm
- Forum: Method and application
- Topic: Consistent PLS (PLSc) compatible with PLS-POS?
- Replies: 0
- Views: 3427
Consistent PLS (PLSc) compatible with PLS-POS?
Hello everyone. Please, let me expose some doubts about using PLSc and PLS-POS. All my model are reflective. So, editor suggest me use PLSc. In the research, I use PLS-POS to segment the sample. But I think PLS-POS is not ready to use PLSc at the moment in SmartPLS. So my dude is: Is it convenient t...
- Wed Jul 01, 2015 1:55 pm
- Forum: Method and application
- Topic: IPMA negative importance
- Replies: 6
- Views: 6614
IPMA negative importance
Hello, there is 3 open topic about negative importance in IPMA. But no one have reply.
I have a IPMA with negative importance. What that´s mean?? Does it make sense? How do I handle this?
Please, can someone reply this comment?
Thank you in advance.
I have a IPMA with negative importance. What that´s mean?? Does it make sense? How do I handle this?
Please, can someone reply this comment?
Thank you in advance.
- Fri Jun 26, 2015 9:18 am
- Forum: Method and application
- Topic: MGA results vs Groups bootstrapping
- Replies: 3
- Views: 3566
Re: MGA results vs Groups bootstrapping
Thank you for the reply. Is it possible to have some references about this phenomenon?
Thank you again.
Manuel
Thank you again.
Manuel
- Thu Jun 25, 2015 11:41 pm
- Forum: Method and application
- Topic: MGA results vs Groups bootstrapping
- Replies: 3
- Views: 3566
MGA results vs Groups bootstrapping
Hello everyone. I have one dude, please can you help me? I am testing a multi-group model. Some relationships shows bootstrapping differences. For example: Quality -> Satisfaction Group 1 p-value 0.236; Group 2 p-value 0.001 BUT the PLS-MGA and others indices shows a p-value of 0.240. What that mean...