Hi,
I have a doubt: i have just 1 HTMT ratio above 0.90 (Teo et al., 2008). The ratio it has is 0.95.
What can I do?
Option 1. Delete 1 of the constructs.
Option 2. check if there is some reference that maintains a ratio of 0.95. (ANY REFERENCE?)
Thanks in advance
Search found 9 matches
- Fri Apr 01, 2022 10:19 am
- Forum: Method and application
- Topic: HTMT ratio above 0.90
- Replies: 2
- Views: 1459
- Tue Jan 23, 2018 2:32 pm
- Forum: Method and application
- Topic: Permutation test significance (PLS-MGA)
- Replies: 1
- Views: 2496
Permutation test significance (PLS-MGA)
Hello once again, I have some doubts with the significance levels of the permutation test for the PLS-MGA. The permutation test recognises differences at the 5% level of significance if the p value is lower than 0.05. Which values do I have to consider to evaluate ***p<0.01; **p<0.05; *p<0.10? Thank...
- Fri Jan 19, 2018 12:33 pm
- Forum: Method and application
- Topic: MICOM
- Replies: 1
- Views: 2471
MICOM
Good afternoon, My doubt is regarding "Results of invariance measurement testing using permutation". I have a PLS-MGA model, and I have just one indicator of Partial measurement invariance established that does not suit Specifically, Compositional invariance (Correlation = 1) C=1 5% quanti...
- Wed Apr 26, 2017 12:59 pm
- Forum: Method and application
- Topic: EFA Higher-Order construct
- Replies: 1
- Views: 2148
EFA Higher-Order construct
Good afternoon, I was asked to test EFA as I have higher-order constructs in my model. I was advised to read "Lee, C., Hallak, R., & Sardeshmukh, S. R. (2016). Innovation, entrepreneurship, and restaurant performance: A higher-order structural model. Tourism Management, 53, 215-228". H...
- Mon Apr 24, 2017 2:26 pm
- Forum: Method and application
- Topic: INDIRECT EFFECTS
- Replies: 1
- Views: 3163
INDIRECT EFFECTS
Good afternoon, I have been asked to report indirect/mediating effects of my model. The direct effects of my model are: Inn --> Ms Inn --> Pre Inn --> Rqu Inn --> Vmo Mo --> Inn Pre --> Ms Rqu --> Ms Vmo ..> Ms The indirect effects that automatically SmartPls 3 reports are: Inn --> Ms Mo --> Ms Mo -...
- Tue Apr 04, 2017 8:27 am
- Forum: Method and application
- Topic: HTMT
- Replies: 3
- Views: 4575
Re: HTMT
Mr Ringle thank you for all your help. The correlation that does not fit <0.90 is between two second order constructs I have just realized that is because it does make sense that one of the first order constructs is included in the other second order construct. May I do a CFA? How can I justify this...
- Sat Apr 01, 2017 8:23 am
- Forum: Method and application
- Topic: HTMT
- Replies: 3
- Views: 4575
HTMT
Good morning,
I have the following problem.
In a second-dimension model, I have one correlation that is 0.979 - when I calculated the model using 1st orders constructs all HTMT fulfilled the criterion (<.80)
How can I fix this issue?
Thanks in advance,
I have the following problem.
In a second-dimension model, I have one correlation that is 0.979 - when I calculated the model using 1st orders constructs all HTMT fulfilled the criterion (<.80)
How can I fix this issue?
Thanks in advance,
- Tue Mar 21, 2017 10:10 am
- Forum: Method and application
- Topic: PLS-MGA Multigroup HTMT
- Replies: 2
- Views: 2709
Re: PLS-MGA Multigroup HTMT
Thank you very much Mr Ringle!
- Mon Mar 20, 2017 7:37 am
- Forum: Method and application
- Topic: PLS-MGA Multigroup HTMT
- Replies: 2
- Views: 2709
PLS-MGA Multigroup HTMT
Hi everybody
I have a PLS-MGA where in one group HTMT ratio is not fulfilled (just by one correlation) and in the other group HTMT ratio is accomplished.
Why does it happen?
How can I justify this correlation (0.882)?
Thanks in advance for your help
I have a PLS-MGA where in one group HTMT ratio is not fulfilled (just by one correlation) and in the other group HTMT ratio is accomplished.
Why does it happen?
How can I justify this correlation (0.882)?
Thanks in advance for your help