Search found 7 matches
- Tue Dec 01, 2015 11:52 am
- Forum: Method and application
- Topic: Reporting effect sizes
- Replies: 2
- Views: 3982
Re: Reporting effect sizes
thank you very much for your helpful answer!
- Mon Nov 23, 2015 4:22 pm
- Forum: Method and application
- Topic: Reporting effect sizes
- Replies: 2
- Views: 3982
Reporting effect sizes
Dear all, I have used Smart PLS 3 for my research and am currently in the phase of writing my results section. However, as the new Smart PLS provides (bootstrapped) Sample Mean f² as well as values for the original f², I wonder which values I should report. The same holds true for adj. R². Could any...
- Tue Sep 15, 2015 11:00 am
- Forum: Method and application
- Topic: consistent PLS Bootstrapping
- Replies: 8
- Views: 12908
Re: consistent PLS Bootstrapping
A question linked to that: Using PLSc and connecting all LVs for the initial calculations results in higher loadings for the indiactors. However, at the same time one R² is consistently missing in the results for one LV. In the model this is the ComClar that is explained by the three (problematic) L...
- Tue Sep 15, 2015 10:25 am
- Forum: Method and application
- Topic: consistent PLS Bootstrapping
- Replies: 8
- Views: 12908
Re: consistent PLS Bootstrapping
Thank you for your reply! The composite reliability of the three problematic PRE-LVs are: 0.867, 0.822, and 0.893 and using PLSc the respective values are: 0.695, 0.306, and 0.831. Wow, that is a huge difference in the composite reliability for the second LV. Indeed, one indicator shows a small oute...
- Fri Sep 11, 2015 12:43 pm
- Forum: Method and application
- Topic: consistent PLS Bootstrapping
- Replies: 8
- Views: 12908
Re: consistent PLS Bootstrapping
Dear Dr. Becker, thank you for your kind answer! Going for the roof, I could isolate the problem being beased in the three "Pre-Conflict" latent variables (the ones on the very left on the illustrated model in the prior attachment). I could run PLSc without these three latent variables suc...
- Thu Sep 10, 2015 4:46 pm
- Forum: Method and application
- Topic: consistent PLS Bootstrapping
- Replies: 8
- Views: 12908
Re: consistent PLS Bootstrapping
Dear all, today I have encountered a very similar problem. Using the standard PLS algorithm, my model (see attachment) works well and results in meaningful insights. However, using PLSc results to problems (indicated by black ? within the samples). The amount of problematic samples with PLSc-procedu...
- Mon Jan 27, 2014 11:33 am
- Forum: SmartPLS 2 - FAQ
- Topic: CFA using SmartPLS
- Replies: 5
- Views: 11695
CFA individual latent variable score
Dear all, I would like to state one follow-up question: I am currently (and for the first time) using smartPLS to engage in a CFA. I have checked for the reliability and validity measures of all my (reflective) latent variables. Now I would like to conduct group comparisons using these latent variab...