Search found 14 matches
- Fri Mar 22, 2013 2:34 pm
- Forum: Method and application
- Topic: bias-corrected bootstrap confidence interval
- Replies: 4
- Views: 3848
- Fri Mar 08, 2013 7:04 am
- Forum: Literature
- Topic: Article
- Replies: 306
- Views: 1595416
- Tue Feb 14, 2012 6:06 pm
- Forum: Method and application
- Topic: Problem with Multicollinearity in covariance based analysis
- Replies: 1
- Views: 1820
Probably not. There is generally very little research showing that PLS would be able to reject false models and there is at least one study that shows that this is indeed the case http://aisel.aisnet.org/icis2010_submissions/21/ How exactly to treat multicollinearity depends on your data and researc...
- Tue Feb 14, 2012 4:51 pm
- Forum: Method and application
- Topic: common method bias test
- Replies: 2
- Views: 2715
You can check my paper on the topic at http://aisel.aisnet.org/icis2011/procee ... methods/8/
If you cannot access that, you can probably find an earlier version with google scholar.
If you cannot access that, you can probably find an earlier version with google scholar.
- Thu Oct 13, 2011 1:37 pm
- Forum: Method and application
- Topic: Interaction effect: Othogonalizing (residual centering)
- Replies: 3
- Views: 4449
Smart PLS does not report residuals. (This is a severe shortcoming, because residual analysis is a standard post-estimation method for all regression analysis based approaches.) If you want to orthogonalize the indicators, you need to do that with some other statistical software (PASW, Stata, R, etc...
- Thu Oct 13, 2011 12:22 pm
- Forum: Method and application
- Topic: Interaction effect: Othogonalizing (residual centering)
- Replies: 3
- Views: 4449
#3 is not orthogonalization. For orthogonalization, you need to first center (I prefer to standardize)the variables that form the interaction term, then regress the product of these two centered variables on the centered variables. Use the residual as the interaction term. If you have variables A an...
- Thu Sep 15, 2011 11:09 am
- Forum: SmartPLS 2 - FAQ
- Topic: PLS and common method variance
- Replies: 1
- Views: 1983
Check the last post in this thread for a link to a forthcoming conference paper on the issue.
viewtopic.php?t=1573
viewtopic.php?t=1573
- Sun Jul 17, 2011 1:18 pm
- Forum: SmartPLS 2 - FAQ
- Topic: common method variance
- Replies: 8
- Views: 8388
- Tue Jul 05, 2011 6:03 pm
- Forum: SmartPLS 2 - FAQ
- Topic: common method variance
- Replies: 8
- Views: 8388
- Tue Mar 08, 2011 6:10 am
- Forum: SmartPLS 2 - FAQ
- Topic: How to use the correlation matrix to run???
- Replies: 3
- Views: 4391
A couple of the Herman Wold's original papers argue that PLS model can be estimated with covariance matrix as the data. Also, the LVPLSC program in the LVPLS software package should be able to estimate such models. Unfortunately, LVPLS does not seem to be available anymore and the description of how...
- Tue Mar 08, 2011 6:06 am
- Forum: Method and application
- Topic: Significance level for correlations coefficients
- Replies: 5
- Views: 5639
Actually, you cannot estimate the significance of correlations with SPSS no more than you can estimate the significance of the path coefficients by comparing these to the appropriate t-distribution. The correlation between PLS scores does not follow any known sampling distribution, so you would need...
- Tue Dec 07, 2010 1:37 pm
- Forum: Method and application
- Topic: How to test for Common Method Variance in PLS?
- Replies: 21
- Views: 42029
This is bit of a bumping an old thread, by we have published a new version of our PLS CMV paper. Also analyzed the Liang et al method and found out that it does not work the way that the paper argues it does. See this thread and the links there.
viewtopic.php?t=1573
viewtopic.php?t=1573
- Tue Dec 07, 2010 1:35 pm
- Forum: Method and application
- Topic: COMMON METHOD BIAS
- Replies: 5
- Views: 3862
You should note that the Liang et al. does actually nothing to control for method variance. The reason for this is explained in detail in our paper that is cited in this thread. We also provide an alternative with simulation evidence supporting the method. http://forum.smartpls.com/viewtopic.php?t=1...
- Tue Dec 07, 2010 1:30 pm
- Forum: SmartPLS 2 - FAQ
- Topic: common method variance
- Replies: 8
- Views: 8388
A more recent version of our PLS CMV paper can be found at
http://www.hut.fi/u/mronkko/PLSCMV.pdf
It contains a better explanation on how to use our method.
This paper will be presented in ICIS 2010 MISQ Workshop and then will be submitted to journal.
http://www.hut.fi/u/mronkko/PLSCMV.pdf
It contains a better explanation on how to use our method.
This paper will be presented in ICIS 2010 MISQ Workshop and then will be submitted to journal.