Invariance model assessment for reflective measurement model

Frequently asked questions about PLS path modeling.
Post Reply
sling
PLS Junior User
Posts: 2
Joined: Fri Jan 19, 2018 8:54 am
Real name and title: Lintje Sie

Invariance model assessment for reflective measurement model

Post by sling » Fri Jan 19, 2018 9:42 am

Hi All,
I understand from Hair et al., (2018) chapter 4 that measurement invariance of composite models (MICOM) procedure can be applied to assess PLS-SEM composite models (related to formative measurement models). Can I use MICOM procedure to assess Common factor models (reflective measurement model)? I have 2 groups with unequal sample size ( group 1 = 1135 , group 2 = 284) , should i use PLS-MGA - Henseler's (2007) approach to compare the path models? For your advice, please.

Thank you.
Ling

User avatar
cringle
SmartPLS Developer
Posts: 791
Joined: Tue Sep 20, 2005 9:13 am
Real name and title: Prof. Dr. Christian M. Ringle
Location: Hamburg (Germany)
Contact:

Re: Invariance model assessment for reflective measurement m

Post by cringle » Tue Jan 23, 2018 11:43 am

Thanks, I already received your other email which I responded to.

Best
CR

alonsodossantos
PLS Junior User
Posts: 5
Joined: Thu May 21, 2015 10:57 pm
Real name and title: Manuel Alonso

Re: Invariance model assessment for reflective measurement model

Post by alonsodossantos » Sun Apr 01, 2018 5:46 pm

Hi All,

Please, would it be possible to access this open-ended answer? I'm interested in the same question.

Post Reply